Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Sourcebook
of Alternative Technologies for Freshwater Augumentation in East and
Central Europe>
1.3 Non-invasive Renovation Of Pipes
Technical Description
This technology, a companion technique to the trenchless technology
described above, is also known as lining. Short segments of piping are
inserted into an existing pipeline and moved along in the direction of
flow using hydraulic or mechanical means. The mechanical variation uses
chains to move the liner along inside the old pipe, while the hydraulic
option uses hydraulic rams to push the liner into place. If there is
sufficient space between the liner and host pipe, the space may be filled
with aggregate.
Extent of Use
This technology is being used in Poland by private contracting firms.
Level of Involvement
This technology may be implemented by private companies, service or
utility firms, and local governmental administrations.
Operation and Maintenance
This is a non-invasive method and requires no excavation prior to the
placement of pipe. Liners may be inserted into existing pipelines through
manholes or other surface entry points. The technology requires specialist
operation and specialised equipment.
Costs
Relatively to the diameter of pipe being repaired, costs range from $100
to $200/m, which is competitive with excavation work.
Effectiveness of the Technology
High effectiveness in the case of corroded and leaky pipes.
Suitability
The technology is suitable for use in all countries within the region.
Advantages
Lining provides greater integrity within the pipe network and may
increase the durability and resistance of the pipeline against corrosion.
This technology takes advantage of existing pipelines and does not result
in disruption of roadways or land surface activities.
Disadvantages
This technology has no identified disadvantages, although lining may
reduce the capacity of the lined pipe by the thickness of the liner.
Hence, lining may not be suitable for use in pipe networks operating at or
near capacity.
Cultural Acceptability
This method is accepted by civil engineering societies. The limited
surface excavation also typically means that this technology is well
accepted by the general public, who are less inconvenienced by this
technique.
Further Development of the Technology
There is a need for the benefits of using this technology to be made
more visible to contractors and consumers.
Information Sources
Reno Rur Centrum Sp. z o.o., Kielce, ul. Warszawska 34,
skr. poczt. nr 624, Poland, Tel. (048-41) 411-41 w. 286, Tel./fax: (0-48 -
41) 44-330.
|