|
|
 |
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Sourcebook
of Alternative Technologies for Freshwater Augumentation in East and
Central Europe>
3.13 Oxidation and Stabilization Ponds
Technical Description
Many chemical compounds are biodegradable, besides the organic
substances which originate from living organisms. Specialised
microorganisms (e.g., bacteria and algae) are able to utilize
hydrocarbons, mineral oils, phenol, heavy metals, artificial substrates,
plastic, etc., as food resources. These biological processes form the
basis of most new methods of wastewater treatment. Similarly, these
processes often lend themselves to use in a well directed and controlled
structure, for example, in activated sludge treatment systems, trickling
filters, or stabilization ponds and biomechanical treatment systems.
The main biochemical processes can be separated into four groups:
anaerobic, aerobic, facultative, and aerated. The appropriate planning of
the pond systems make it possible to treat raw sewage, pretreat raw
sewage, and final treat biologically purified sewage. Bacteria eliminate
the organic substances present in the wastewater, while algae produce
oxygen. Bacteria act in both an aerobic degradation mode, where the energy
source is organic carbon and the oxidized products originate from CO2,
SO4, and PO4; and an anaerobic-reduction mode. These latter processes
include facultative processes wherein heterotrophic bacteria produce fatty
acids, alcohols, and aldehydes from organic substrates; and anaerobic
processes wherein methane bacteria transform carbohydrates to methane by
fermentation. Likewise, algae are capable of autotrophic and heterotrophic
modes of action. The photosynthetic groups are the most important because
they produce oxygen for the bacteria and animals. If the water is acidic
(an H-donor), then the dominant process is autotrophic photolithotrophy.
If there are any organic compounds, then it is heterotrophic
photolithotrophy. The main algal genera are Chlamydomonas, Chlorella,
Ankistrodesmus, Scenedesmus, Oscillatoria, Anabaena,
Phacus, and Euglena. Under suitable conditions,
protozoans, rotifers, and nematodes feed on the algae, thereby also
playing an important role in the metabolism of the pond.
Use of an oxidation pond system for the final treatment of sewage from
oil refineries has been very successful. For example, after a 40 day
retention period, the 500 mg/dm3 COD concentration of an oil-sewage water
emulsion was reduced to between 150 and 180 mg/dm3. In another case,
following the activated sludge treatment, the oily, polluted water was
final treated in an aerobic oxidation pond with a 40 day retention time.
This resulted in an 80% decline in oil concentration in the effluent.
Similarly, biomechanical combined oxidation system effluent treatment
technologies have been developed using similar technology to purify
domestic sewage from communities with a population of between 2 000 and
200 000 individuals. This technology is also particularly suitable for the
treatment of strong organic wastes. The technology is similar to that used
in stabilization ponds, because it is based on the natural biodegradation
processes. Purification takes place in a series of treatment units. After
primary settlement, the sewage flows into the first treatment unit, which
is operated as a pre-treatment section and is designed to achieve a 70% to
80% BOD removal efficiency. The remaining units operate as secondary
treatment systems wherein oxygen is produced by photosynthesis. This
treatment efficiency can be increased by the simple application of sand
filtration as a tertiary treatment stage. In this type of biomechanical
system, the treatment units are arranged as rings in which oxygen is
produced by photosynthetic symbiotic bacteria and algae in the secondary
treatment unit which surrounds the circular pretreatment unit. Treatment
efficiency is increased by recirculating the liquid between the various
treatment units, generally using an automated pump system. The oxygen
produced by photosynthesis is supplemented by means of a floating
mechanical aerator placed in the first stage of treatment. This aerator is
operated intermittently by automatic control depending on oxygen
concentrations within the units.
The concentration of active biomass contained in the biomechanical units
is considerably less than that required for conventional activated sludge
or oxidation ditch treatment, and the aeration system has a specific power
demand of approximately one tenth that used in a conventional plant. A
major advantage of this system is the fact that no surplus secondary
sludge is produced and; therefore, no settlement tank, sludge treatment
system, or sludge return facilities are required in the secondary
treatment stages.
|
Oxidation Ditch
A variation on the oxidation, stabilization, and biomechanical
wastewater treatment pond technology is the oxidation ditch, a closed
loop around which the mixed wastewater is circulated by horizontally
mounted aeration rotors, whose number depends on the applied load and
the degree of purification required. The circulation channel generally
has a trapezoidal cross section width of 0.5 m to 3.0 m and a depth of
0.8 m to 1.3 m. The ditch can be artificially lined if the soil
conditions warrant. Unlike the pond systems, the oxidation ditch
usually has a separate final settlement tank. Different aeration
systems can be placed at various point within the ditch to achieve the
same effect as multiple pond basins (i.e., by using a surface aerator
with an efficiency of 1.2 to 2.4 kg O2/kWh, a fine air diffusor with
an efficiency of 1.5 to 3.6 kg O2/kWh, or a coarse air diffusor with
an efficiency of 0.9 to 1.2 kg O2/kWh). To avoid low efficiencies as a
result of high dissolved oxygen concentrations, oxygen meters should
be placed to monitor dissolved oxygen concentrations and control the
aerators.
After bar screening, wastewater enters the aeration ditch where it
is mixed thoroughly with air. Aerobic bacteria present in this chamber
use the oxygen to convert the organic wastes into a more reduced form.
After aeration, the liquid flows into the settling chamber where the
suspended particles and activated sludge are separated from the
effluent.
The loading rate of the system is low; the hydraulic retention time
is high.
Oxidation ditches, with a treatment capacity of 40 to 10 000 m3/day,
are a popular treatment system in communities of about 10 000 persons
in Hungary. |
Extent of Use
All the known biological technologies used in Hungary are used for the
treatment of different sewage waters. The first stabilization ponds in
Hungary were built about 60 years ago. Since the 1960s, the number of
these ponds has increased, largely due to their application for the
treatment of wastewater from chemical works. Stabilization ponds are also
widely used in Poland. In Latvia, where there are large systems of
poldered lands, nutrient-rich and pesticide-contaminated surface waters
are drained water to biological stabilization ponds prior to discharge to
natural surface waters.
Operation and Maintenance
Operational and running costs are 40% to 70% less than those normally
associated with single stage, conventional treatment systems. Total power
demand also is reduced by 50% in comparison with conventional activated
sludge systems. The total treatment efficiency of the system, however, is
approximately 90% of the conventional plants. Maintenance is very simple
and includes the removal of excessive aquatic vegetation. This system has
been tested over many years and is considered to be a proven technology in
the region.
Level of Involvement
Oxidation, stabilization and biomechanical treatment technologies are
generally implemented at the local administration, corporate, and
household levels.
Costs
Costs depend on the scale of a project. For agricultural stabilization
ponds, the ponds are sized at approximately 3 to 5 m³/ha of
agricultural land served, and building costs are at the level of $10 to
$20/m³ of pond volume.
Effectiveness of the Technology
The efficiency of operation of stabilization ponds depends mainly on the
environmental conditions (light, temperature, etc.), and the quantity and
quality of the sewage water. Sewage stabilization ponds have a great
economic advantage compared to other treatment techniques, but the
efficiency of treatment is lower. Biomechanical systems with primary
settlement can achieve a 70% to 80% BOD removal efficiency. With secondary
treatment, these units can achieve approximately 90% BOD removal
efficiency. This efficiency, however, depends mainly on environmental
conditions and can vary as the quantity and quality of the sewage varies.
Suitability
These technologies are suitable for use in the treatment of domestic and
industrial sewage. In many cases, two or more biological methods are used
in series. The number of treatment units required depends on the nature of
the effluent being treated, but the construction of additional units is
simple and economical. The system is particularly suited for the treatment
of strongly organic wastes, especially where there are wide variations in
the volumetric and BOD loadings. The system has an inherent buffering
characteristic and is particularly suitable for use in situations were
shock loading and pH variations are expected. It is consequently resistant
to "bulking", which is often a major problem with activated
sludge systems.
Advantages
This is a cost-effective technology.
Disadvantages
The disadvantage of the biomechanical systems is their dependence on
climate and weather conditions. At low temperatures, as in winter, the
natural biodegradation processes are very slow and the rate of algae
growth is limited. In such circumstances, the efficiency of the treatment
decreases. In summer, though, the systems respond with high rates of algal
growth, which can result in a measurable COD concentration in the outflow.
Oxidation, stabilization and biomechanical pond technologies are
land-intensive technologies.
Cultural Acceptability
This technology is an efficient wastewater treatment technology, well
accepted by engineers and society.
Further Development of the Technology
The technology is complete in itself.
Information Sources
Petèr Kovac and Dr Kornèlia H.
Kocsis, Felsö - Tisza - Vidèki Környezetvèdelmi
Felügyelösèg, 4400 Nyiregyhàza, Szèchenyi
u.19, Hungary, Tel. (36-42) 310 155, fax: (36-42) 310 713.
Rolands Bebris, Ministry of Environmental Protection and
Regional Development, 25 Peldu Str., 1494 Riga, Latvia, Tel. (371-7)
227145, fax: (371-7) 820442, e-mail: BEBRI@VARAM.GOV.LV.
Anna Egle, V/U "Meliorprojects", 11 Novembra
Bulvaris 31, LV-1494 Riga, Latvia, Tel. (371-7) 228734.
|
 |
|