Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Sourcebook
of Alternative Technologies for Freshwater Augumentation in East and
Central Europe>
1.11 Efficient Water Use In Small Hydropower Plants
Technical Description
Small hydropower plants often make inefficient use of water resources,
and lack automated power generation technologies. To improve efficiency,
dispatcher schedules have been worked out for many of the cascade
reservoirs used for hydropower production in Latvia, including the Ciria,
Ruonu, and Aiviekstes hydropower facilities. Based upon this
schedule, power generation capacity shifts from upstream reservoirs within
the cascade to the downstream reservoirs so that the reservoir water
levels vary from maximum supply level to minimum supply level in the
upstream to downstream direction. This ensures that water is used
efficiently and that each reservoir operates over its optimal range of
water levels necessary for power generation purposes. For such a scheduled
series of shifts in the locus of power production, it is necessary that
the management authority have a good understanding of the water regime
within the river basin and of the discharges needed for optimal generator
operation. In Latvia, there is an established base of hydrological
information which makes efficient water use possible within the national
hydropower plant network. An important, related issue to the efficient use
of water by hydropower generation systems within cascade reservoir series
is the minimization harmful effects on environment created by erratic
fluctuations in river flows and lake water levels. Use of cascade
reservoirs is beneficial in that the construction costs of impoundments
may also be lower.
Extent of Use
Since the early Middle Ages, watermills have been built in Latvia. In
the beginning, these activities lacked a strong theoretical basis, and
some watermills (and, later, small hydropower plants) lacked sufficient
water to operate around the year. While an improved understanding of the
hydrology, and technological advances in low head generation units, have
overcome the early limitations, there has been a trend in modern times to
replace small hydropower generation stations with larger schemes, as has
occurred at the Great Plavinas and Riga and the reconstructed Kegums
hydropower plants. The larger plants, constructed prior to the
introduction of automated control systems, were often more cost effective
than smaller, cascade systems give personnel costs associated with their
operation. Most recently, however, there has been a shift in this policy,
in an effort to achieve energy independence, that favours cascade systems
of hydropower generation, in part, because of the high fuel costs
associated with thermogeneration plants. To encourage the production of
hydropower, the state electricity corporation, Latvenergo, is offering
small hydroelectricity producers a premium of 200% in comparison to the
prices paid for other sources of energy through the year 2000. Small
hydropower plants have been estimated to be able to produce up to 1 000
MW/yr.
Operation and Maintenance
Determination of dispatcher schedules requires the services of both
computer personnel and hydrologists. Once the schedule has been
determined, regular hydrological monitoring should be undertaken to allow
modifications of the regime due to intra- and inter-annual variability in
river flows and lake levels. Implementation of the power production
schedules requires installation of electronic control systems linking each
of the generation plants and water control structures within the cascade.
Maintenance is required of the electronic control systems and moving
parts, such as water control gates and turbines, that form the structural
elements of more effective hydropower generation.
Level of Involvement
Because of the nature of cascade reservoirs and the degree of
coordination required, this technology is best implemented by local and
regional watershed management administrations in cooperation with the
hydropower companies.
Costs
There are no increased costs associated with the infrastructural
investments required for conventional small hydropower plants. Indeed,
staff and development costs may be lower as fewer operators can control a
larger number of small dams.
Effectiveness of the Technology
The efficiency of water use for hydropower generation can be increased
from 50% to between 90% and 98% of the annual runoff volume used to
generate hydropower. This technology is also effective in regulating
unscheduled or erratically-scheduled discharges and makes more efficient
use of turbines.
Suitability
This technology is most suitable for use in new and existing, small
hydropower plants arranged as a cascade along a water course. Similar
technologies could be used for scheduling hydropower generation needs
across watershed boundaries.
Advantages
This technology provides for more efficient power production, as well as
enhanced water retention within the catchment area that benefits
lacustrine and riverine ecosystems.
Disadvantages
The excessive or erratic regulation of water flows in rivers can
threaten wetlands and fisheries.
Cultural Acceptability
This technology is well-accepted by citizens who benefit from the
improved availability of electricity and water. However, greater
acceptance of this technology by technical staff is needed.
Further Development of the Technology
Because of the key role that hydrological data play in this technology,
better tools for environmental data collection and assessment are
required.
Information Sources
Rolands Bebris, Ministry of Environmental Protection and
Regional Development, 25 Peldu Str., 1494 Riga, Latvia, Tel. (371-7)
227145, fax: (371-7) 820442, e-mail: BEBRI@VARAM.GOV.LV.
Anna Egle, V/U "Meliorprojects", 11 Novembra
Bulvaris 31, LV-1494 Riga, Latvia, Tel. (371-7) 228734.
Dr. hab. Ansis Ziveris, 63 - 33 Bikerniek Street,
LV-1059 Riga, Latvia.
|