Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Sourcebook
of Alternative Technologies for Freshwater Augumentation in East and
Central Europe>
2.4 Biofiltration
Technical Description
Technology of biofiltration is based on the controlled use of the
ecological characteristics of common mollusc species, such as the
freshwater mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Freshwater mussels are natural
filter feeders, which effectively and efficiently filter organic and
inorganic matter from the water. Freshwater mussels and other water
sedentary organisms (such as bacteria, rotatoria, sponges, coelenterates,
infusoria, and crustaceans) which constitute the periphyton can, on a
specially prepared, artificial bedding with an open weave, create a
biological membrane that can effectively purifying water contaminated with
organic matter, bacteria, and other biogenic elements.
Providing the mollusc species with appropriate bedding on which other
organisms are also able to grow results in the creation of a "living
biofiltration system" that is both self-reproducing and highly
efficient in reducing concentrations of pollutants in water. For example,
such a biofiltration system, or biological membrane, was installed in Raci
Lake during 1994. This system consists of a collector panel with 50
biofiltration units. Each unit is a simple sack made of suitable material
with a float inside (typically, a sealed plastic bottle). Collector panel
is fixed by ropes anchored to concrete weights placed on the lake bottom.
Native lake organisms, naturally occurring in the lake water, settle (as
larvae) on the sacking and grow.
Extent of Use
This method has been field tested at a few natural sites in Bory
Tucholskie (Raci Lake, Suszek), in the northern part of Poland, and there
are two known full-scale applications of this technology; one, used for
treatment of waters discharged from a salmon trout hatchery and fish farm,
at Laska Bia a, Mytlof, and the other, used to purify contaminated water,
at Raci Lake.
Operation and Maintenance
Most of the operation is undertaken during the initial stage of
preparing the artificial bedding and positioning the unit within the
waterbody. Subsequently, some limited control and repairs must be
completed. Because the technique uses biological material that naturally
occurs in inland waters, the succession of molluscs on the bedding is
fully natural process which does not require any intervention. Materials
for the bedding are simple and easy to obtain (some waste materials, such
as the plastic bottles used for floats, can be utilized).
Level of Involvement
This technique is usually implemented at the local administration level.
Costs
The technology has very low costs. Most construction, including the
preparation of the bedding (using waste materials), can be accomplished
with minimal labour and materials costs.
Effectiveness of the Technology
The filtration capacity is a characteristic feature of every mollusc
species. Freshwater mussels are the most efficient filter feeders in
central European inland waters, with a single freshwater mussel (about 3
cm in diameter) filtering around 100 ml/hour. Because of high density of
mollusc population (up to a few thousand per m2), the volume of water
filtered is very large. Freshwater mussel populations living on a
biological barrier with an area of 100 m2 can filter between 500 and 28
000 m3/day and absorb up to 5.5 g of phosphorus and 11.5 g of nitrogen
(depending on biological activity).
Suitability
The method is suitable for use in most natural and artificial
waterbodies, and can be applied as a polishing step at existing wastewater
treatment facilities. It is especially useful in areas with low to
moderate environmental impacts. [Caution: Non-native species should
not be introduced into waterways.]
Advantages
This biohydrotechnology does not impact natural movements of water
within a water body, and, thus, appears to be a useful means for upgrading
water quality and ecological value using native aquatic fauna and flora.
Because of the flexibility of the technology, and the possible wide range
of modifications, it could be used in most types of waterbodies. The
technique should be effective over a range of pollutant types. The
technology has a very low cost, can be implemented in a phased manner, and
is highly effective and efficient.
Disadvantages
In case of chemically polluted waters, persistent pollutants like heavy
metals may interfere with the biological utilization of contaminants.
Cultural Acceptability
Method is based on natural ecological processes and is fully acceptable.
Further Development of the Technology
This method is experimental and some research is needed to optimize the
design specifications and verify its efficiency, especially under a range
of pollution conditions.
Information Sources
Prof. Dr. hab. Roman Gondko, University of ód ,
Department of Biology and Earth Sciences General Biophysics Unit, ul. St.
Banacha 12/16, 90-237 ód , Poland, Tel. (48-42) 35 44 74, fax:
(48-42) 35 44 73.
Janusz Krupanek, Institute for Ecology of Industrial
Areas, ul. Kossutha 6, Katowice, Poland, Tel.(48-3) 1546031, fax: (48-3)
1541717, e-mail: jan@amnesia.ietu.us.edu.pl.
|