|
|
 |
Newsletter and Technical Publications
Freshwater Management Series No. 5
Guidelines for the Integrated Management of
the Watershed
- Phytotechnology and Ecohydrology -
F. Policy and institutional approaches: the ecohydrology challenge
The maintenance of homeostatic equilibrium in
the ecosystem in order to ensure its ability to continue to produce the desired
resources, and to preserve and even enhance its resilience and carrying
capacity to assimilate natural and anthropogenic stresses, is a key element in
achieving sustainable development. The ecohydrological
approach, by integrating knowledge of biota with that on the whole range of
hydrological processes at medium or mesoscale (which includes microhabitats,
river systems, and catchment areas), provides the scientific background for
maintaining the integrity of ecological processes. This integration is one of
the three key considerations on which the concept of sustainable development
has been built, as depicted in Figure 1.15.
Being that water is essential to human life and
economic growth, sound management of water resources is central to sustainable
development. Ecohydrology, therefore, recognises that sustainable development
is dependent on the ability of the ecosystem to maintain the
evolutionary-established processes and patterns of water and nutrient
circulation, and energy flows, at the basin scale.
In promoting the integration of the catchment
and biota into a Platonian superorganism, the use of ecosystem properties
becomes a management tool, within which ecohydrology can address fundamental
aspects of water resources management. In effect, it provides the sound
scientific basis for adopting the watershed as the basic planning unit. By
incorporating the concept of improved ecosystem resilience into the management
tool, ecohydrology strengthens the rationale for adopting a preventive,
holistic, and global approach to the watershed - as opposed to the reactive,
sectoral, and site specific approach typical of present extended practices in
water resources management. At the same time, ecohydrology stresses the
importance of ecotechnological measures as an integral component of water
management, complementing standard engineering approaches.
But water resources management goes
beyond these fundamental aspects, concerning the understanding of natural
processes and adoption of technological approaches, to address the optimum
development and use of water resources and their protection. Further,
development, use, and protection, in terms of an ecohydrological approach, extend
to present and intergenerational equity concerns, and a full accounting for the
economic, social, and environmental values of water. Thus, ecohydrology
involves policy, institutional, economic, social, environmental and legal
issues which configure a multidimensional space which needs to be integrated by
means of sound management tools and approaches.

Fig. 1.15. Interrelationships
among economic growth, equity and sustainability
During recent decades, knowledge derived from
successes and failures in the management of the environment and natural
resources, particularly water, has contributed to build up a well documented
set of basic principles for sound management of water and other natural
resources, and for the protection of the environment, particularly aquatic
ecosystems. These principles constitute a rationale, founded upon scientific
knowledge, which, according to generalised worldwide experience, guaranteeing a
better approach to the global objective of "sustainable management of water
resources, including the protection of aquatic ecosystems and freshwater living
resources".
Mar del Plata 1977, Dublin 1992, RúŒ de Janeiro 1992, and many other,
renowned international meetings are milestones at which some basic global
understandings, such as the rational use of water; integrated management of
water resources; use of the watershed as a basic planning unit; the social and
economic value of water; the role of water in ecosystem protection; etc., have
been achieved. Together with the need for sound management tools, such as
proper regulatory frameworks, the incorporation and transfer of "clean"
technologies, environmental education, public participation, access to
information, use of economic and financial instruments, and the promotion of
sustainable practices, etc., these principles have gained international
consensus. In particular, Dublin’s principles1 stand out among them
because of their extended and complete recognition.
The international community, in its search for universal truths and
simplicity, attempted to summarise this global knowledge in so-called "paradigms" which express, in a few words, a complex set of scientific,
technological, policy, institutional, social, economic, and environmental
issues. At the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED
92), "sustainable development" - based on the definition proposed by the
renowned Bruntland Commission2 - was incorporated into a broadly-accepted
paradigm expressing the need to carry out development actions within the framework
of economic efficiency, social acceptability, and ecological integrity.
With regard to water resources, Chapter 18 of UNCED´s Agenda 21
noted the concept of
integrated water resources management, based on "the perception of water as an
integral part of the ecosystem, a natural resource and a social and economic
good, whose quantity and quality determine the nature of its utilization".
Including the Dublin principles, integrated water resources management is
presently being widely adopted as the paradigm which should drive society
toward sustainable development of water resources. The Global Water Partnership
(GWP), which is intensively contributing to spread the concept, adopted the
following definition: "Integrated water resources management is a process that
promotes the coordinated development and management of water, land and related
resources in order to maximize the resultant economic and social welfare in an
equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital
ecosystems."
The term "integrated" implies a multidimensional concept which calls for
the simultaneous consideration of natural resources, social, cultural,
institutional, regulatory, economic, and political issues in the watershed. As
a reaction to the sectoral, thematic, and geographical fragmentation that has
characterised present water resources management in most parts of the world,
integrated water resources management pursues integration within and between
the natural and socioeconomic components of the environment, utilising the
river basin as the natural planning unit.
The concept of Integrated Water Resources Management - in contrast to
"traditional," fragmented water resources management - at its
most fundamental level is as concerned with the management of water demand as
with its supply. Thus, integration can be considered within two basic systems:
- the natural system, with its critical
importance for resource availability and quality, and
- the human system, which fundamentally
determines the levels of resource use, waste production, and pollution of
the resource, and which must also set development priorities.
Integration has to
occur both within and between these categories, taking into account variability
in time and space3.
Ecohydrology is another "paradigm" which addresses the integrated study
and use of ecosystems, including their hydrological characteristics and
processes, and their combined potential to influence water dynamics and
quality, particularly at the catchment scale. In terms of integrated water resources
management, it addresses, and scientifically strongly supports, integration
within the natural system as well as providing guiding principles and tools to
integrate a consideration of ecosystem components within the development
framework. Furthermore it enhances a preventive approach, through ecosystem
resilience improvement, that amplifies opportunities for achieving sustainable
development.
Within the context of integrated water resources management,
ecohydrology should be incorporated into the objectives and policy framework
for water management at the highest institutional levels, as well as be
disseminated at the community level to promote environmental awareness, enhance
water resources values, and stimulate their protection.
Ecohydrology also provides scientific support for the use of the
watershed as the planning unit of choice for water resources management. In
this manner, ecohydrology contributes to building a basin approach to water
resources management at the community level. In effect, ecohydrology creates a
common watershed vision that is fundamental for promoting the active
involvement and participation of stakeholders, and for putting into effect a
process of "social negotiation" which should be at the root of all
decision-making within a basin. Also, it facilitates the solution of
downstream-upstream conflicts through enhancing so-called
"hydro-solidarity."
Ecohydrology also helps to strengthen the incorporation of social and
environmental values into strategic water resources planning at the watershed
level, facilitating technological approaches that will contribute to
sustainability, making use of ecosystem properties. Improved ecosystem
resilience and ecotechnologies may well be an integral part of pollution
prevention and water quality restoration programs and measures.
By simultaneously addressing both hydrological and biotic processes at
various levels (microhabitat, river systems, entire watershed) within the
ecosystem, ecohydrology provides a sound basis for land and water use, as well
as for integrated surface and ground water management. Thus, ecohydrological
principles may strongly influence the conceptual basis upon which regulatory
and economic instruments are devised to induce human behaviours compatible with
the objectives and goals of strategic, basin-scale planning.
Because of its holistic and basin wide approach, ecohydrology requires a
strong commitment from governments and water users to strengthen the knowledge
base - in terms of monitoring and data management, research and technological
development. It also involves the joint efforts of governmental agencies and
stakeholders across various jurisdictional boundaries within a basin to
coordinate data gathering, information exchange, and joint interpretation of
ecosystem functioning, root cause analyses, and the effects of human
interventions on ecosystem components. It basically requires that stakeholders,
users, and civil society become aware of its principles and guidelines for
action, thus promoting a bottom up process that will instill ecohydrological
principles into institutional and legal frameworks.
Therefore, ecohydrology should evolve from a
scientific approach to an institutional approach, within the framework of
integrated water resources management, incorporating the economic, financial
and social dimensions that currently characterise globally-accepted paradigms.
|
 |
|