Newsletter and Technical Publications
<The Councillor as Guardian of the Environment>
An
Essay and Workshop for Local Elected Leaders on Environmental Governance with
Emphasis on Adopting Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs) -
Training for Elected Leadership -
Part II - Workshop on the Councillor as Guardian of
the Environment - WORKSHOP -
WORKSHOP COMPONENTS
13.10 Trainer Presentation: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
ASSESSMENT
| Time Required: 30 minutes |
To help participants recognize the value of regular, systematic
assessment of environmental risks and to use assessment data to set
priorities for local government intervention.
Develop a short presentation to prepare participants for
the next exercise on environmental risk assessment. As preparation, use
material from Part I of the preceding essay, Assessing Risks,
supplemented by the following information and ideas of your own.
Risk is the likelihood of adverse effects resulting from
exposure to dangerous events or conditions. Assessment is a systematic
process for examining the potential exposure of people and the ecology to
the harm presented by a risk. Environmental risk assessment is a way of
estimating the environmental risk to humans or ecological systems from
toxic agents. Applied to the role of government, an environmental risk
assessment can provide councillors with an economically, socially, and
politically defensible basis for investments in policies or programmes to
protect, preserve or enhance the local environment.
| Trainers' note: To encourage thinking
about identifying existing or potential sources of risk, you might ask a
question at this point such as: what methods do you use as a councillor
to learn about conditions in the community that need to be corrected or
to assess the actual impact of public policy implementation? A second
question might be used as a follow up: how could these methods be more
systematic? Engage participants in a discussion. |
Environmental risk assessment is a practice long used to
evaluate the probable risk to human life from adverse elements in the
environment. The process has become more sophisticated over the years as
exposure to adverse elements in the environment has become increasingly
common. The need for a systematic process for assessing risk has been
stimulated in recent years by several factors. One of these is population
growth, urbanization and industrialization, flooding, land slides, noise
and many other problems which have vastly different consequences for more
and less developed parts of the world. Another factor is the increasing
concern for potential harm to ecological systems, resulting in a new body
of knowledge about non-human elements in the environment leading to a
process known as ecological risk assessment. Further complicating
things is a vast increase in the amount of information available to the
public about the hazards of environmental pollution spurred on by
large-scale and widely publicized environmental disasters like Chernobyl
and Mt. Pinatubo.
Undertaking an environmental risk assessment is a process
with three steps. The first step is problem formulation or taking
steps to more fully understand environmental problems that are a potential
risk to humans or the ecology (refer to Exercise 13.4 for a review of
the problem formulation process).
The second step in undertaking an environmental risk
assessment is analysis of the potential exposure and effects.
Analysis includes all necessary steps to evaluate the extent of long and
short term consequences of the environmental exposure facing the
community. The third step, risk characterization, is the
integration of both the exposure and the effect of that exposure on those
who would be adversely effected. These two steps, often technically
demanding, may persuade the council to seek the specialized knowledge and
skill of experts. Expertise such as this often can be found near home,
although characterization of the risk may make it necessary to seek
technical assistance elsewhere.
It is important for local officials to realize that
technical assistance is only part of the process of finding solutions to
complex environmental problems. Environmental risk assessment is a means
for assembling relevant information about a problem. It is not, in itself,
a decision about what should be done. What is done is a judgment call by
the people concerned based in part on their understanding of the data but
also on their values, fears, and concepts of what is important. It is the
task of the councillor to interpret the will of the people and act
accordingly.
The Sustainable Cities Programme (SCP) is a process for
assessing environmental issues leading to the discovery of environmental
hazards (natural and human-induced). SCP is the product of an operational
collaboration between UNCHS (Habitat) and UNEP. An important step in the
SCP is the assembly and analysis of existing data on a participating
community's environmental problems. Together with information on the
community's existing environmental infrastructure and services and on
nearby ecological systems, a SCP Environment Profile is compiled. The
profile becomes the community's environmental data base. It is gradually
refined through public discussion and used to reach agreement on
strategies and action plans by problem-specific working groups consisting
of stakeholders and technical support staff.
The Sustainable Ismailia Project is good illustration of
environmental profiling. Ismailia is an Egyptian town of 270,000
inhabitants located on the Suez Canal. An early step in Ismailia's SCP was
the preparation of an environmental profile. The profile was prepared to
identify both environmental and developmental concerns. Some of the
concerns identified for development of the profile were these:
- Land tenure and physical constraints greatly hamper the reclamation
of lands that have become waterlogged and overly saline in content
because of inadequate drainage.
- There is increasing pollution of Lake Timsah, an important tourist
attraction, from ships and shipyard activity, pesticide run-off from
agricultural hinterlands, and sewage from unserviced parts of the
community.
- A complex institutional framework in Ismailia complicates decision
making with much of the power centralized in line ministries, severe
constraints on the mobilization of local resources, and many national
agencies with extraordinarily independent powers.
- Environmental data is dispersed throughout many local institutions or
can be found only by searching through national or international agency
offices in Cairo.
- While the economy is dominated by government, there is a dynamic
private sector in the areas of land reclamation, manufacturing, tourism
and contracting.
- Non-profit organization, whether community-based or vountary, are
weakly represented in Ismailia.13
Ismailia's profile was more than a data base on environmental concerns.
It included development issues as well. Also analysed was the physical,
economic, and institutional context within which environmental action
planning would take place.
| Trainers' note: The information on the
Sustainable Ismailia Project could be photocopied, reproduced and
circulated as a participant handout. Or it might be used as the basis
for another case study in the event there is a need for supplemental
workshop content. A useful question for discussion might be: "Given
this mix of development issues, what would you suggest as a way to
assess the extent of the problem facing Ismailia's public leadership?" |
Risk Assessment is a process for examining the
potential exposure of people and the ecology to the harm presented by an
existing or potential risk. Assessment of environmental risk is a process
consisting of three steps: problem formulation, analysis of exposure and
effects, and risk characterization. Environmental profiles, an important
component of the Sustainable Cities Programme, provide decision makers
with a comprehensive and renewable source of information on a community's
most critical environmental issues, the capacity of its infrastructure and
institutions to respond, and the vulnerability of its ecology to systemic
environmental hazards.
|