Newsletter and Technical Publications
<The Councillor as Guardian of the Environment>
An
Essay and Workshop for Local Elected Leaders on Environmental Governance with
Emphasis on Adopting Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs) -
Training for Elected Leadership -
Part II - Workshop on the Councillor as Guardian of
the Environment - WORKSHOP -
WORKSHOP COMPONENTS
13.2 Trainer Presentation: CONCEPTS AND PROBLEMS
| Time Required: 30 minutes |
This presentation is to: 1) clarify the meaning of several important
environmentally related concepts which have different meanings but are
often used interchangeably causing confusion, and 2) familiarize
participants with the problem formulation process.
Develop a short presentation to prepare participants for the following
exercises on identifying and formulating environmental problems. As
preparation, use the material on Assessing Risks from Part I
supplemented by the following information and ideas of your own.
Precision in the use of environmental terms is important . The terms
problem, hazard, and risk are used extensively in
the environmental literature to describe conditions associated with the
threat of exposure for humans and the ecology to toxic agents. Used
interchangeably, however, as they often are, these terms can be a source
of confusion and misunderstanding. Accurate formulation of environmental
problems is a way of narrowing the focus of concern to the "real"
environmental problems and avoid spending time on symptoms and solutions
masquerading as problems.
The environmental field is replete with technical terms. Owing to the
complexity of the terminology and the resulting potential for differences
in meaning, many technical documents on environmental matters come with a
glossary of technical terms. Lay people, like councillors, have little
need to know or use many of these terms. However, a few of the more common
ones can be problematic if they are used incorrectly or as synonyms for
one another. We have selected several of these common terms for this
presentation. We have selected these particular terms because they are so
often used interchangeably and because of the difficulty of communicating
effectively about environmental matters without using them. The three
terms we want to clarify are:
1. Problem 2. Hazard 3. Risk
| Trainers note: Introduce these
three concepts by printing them in large letters on a sheet of newsprint
and keeping them in front of participants throughout the presentation |
Normally any discussion among councillors or with staff or
community residents about unsatisfactory urban environmental conditions
will include use of the terms problem, hazard, and risk. Lets take a few
moments to agree on a common definition for each of them and then look at
how they are related to one another.
| Trainers note: A good starting
point is to ask participants how they would define each of these terms,
one term at a time. Write down a few of the definitions they offer for
each term on a sheet of newsprint. Observe any obvious differences in
the definitions and comment on the confusion that can result when
important terms like these mean different things to different people.
Then write your own definition for each of the terms (see below) and
continue with the presentation. |
Trainer's definitions:
- Problem: the discrepancy between what is wrong and what is
right as related to urban environmental conditions.
- Hazard: a possible cause of harm to people or damage to the
ecology.
- Risk: the probability of an adverse effect, direct or
indirect, on human health or the ecology.
Let's look more closely at these definitions. When we speak of a
problem, as defined this way, we mean conditions that are not as they
should be. For example, the existence of uncollected and rotting garbage
at the curb in an urban residential area might be regarded as an
undesirable condition or problem. A problem becomes a hazard when it has
the potential to harm people or cause damage to the environment. Curbside
rotting garbage, for example, is a hazard to human health to the extent
that is serves as a food source for rodents with disease-carrying
potential. A hazard poses a risk when exposure to the hazard is sufficient
in length and intensity to produce expected ill effects. The hazard posed
by curbside rotting garbage, for example, becomes a risk when it continues
to be uncollected and there is evidence of illness in the neighborhood
that could be the result of contact with contaminated food or
disease-bearing rodents.
A graphic and perhaps oversimplified portrayal of the relationship of
these three terms might look like this:
PERSISTENT POTENTIAL PROBABLE
PROBLEMS
HAZARDS
RISK
| Trainers note: Print this
simple graphic in large letters on a sheet of newsprint and tape it to a
wall of the training room so that it is in front of participants
throughout the workshop. |
As we have observed, the first contact for most councillors
with issues of environmental sustainability is a problem or problems with
possible environmental consequences. Problem formulation, sometimes called
problem finding, is taking steps to more fully understand environmental
concerns that could be hazardous and, thereby, pose a significant risk to
humans or the ecology. Problem formulation might be described as narrowing
the focus of concern. This is necessary to provide widespread assurance
that the problem is serious and urgent enough that the community and the
council are willing to invest resources to deal with it. Formulating the
problem involves taking a closer look at it; that is, asking questions
about the problem that can aid understanding. Questions that might be
asked are:
- Why is it a problem?
- What possible hazard does the problem represent?
- What is the probability that the problem could lead to an
environmental risk?
- What might happen if nothing is done about the problem?
| Trainers note: List these
questions ahead of time on a sheet of newsprint or a transparency plate
for overhead projection. |
Be careful in problem formulation not to fall into one of
two common traps. The first trap is to mistake the problem for one of its
symptoms, i.e., a local authority cleaning up a polluted wetland area
without adopting tough, new regulations that would prevent this from
happening again. Another trap to avoid is confusing the problem with a
solution. A common example of this dilemma is the local authority with a
solid waste disposal problem. When asked to identify the problem,
councillors might say they need to acquire a sizable, accessible tract of
land for the disposal of the community's solid waste. A solution it is,
but what's the problem? By looking more closely at the situation,
councillors might discover two problems hiding behind their solution. One,
doubling of the weekly volume of garbage for disposal resulting from a
recent population explosion. Another, rising cost for compliance with new
disposal regulations imposed by the central government. Discovery of the "real"
problem could help councillors realize that the landfill was only one of
several possible solutions to their two-faced solid waste disposal
dilemma.
A common vocabulary is important in any field of endeavor. With respect
to environmentally sustainability, agreement on the meaning of basic words
like problem, hazard, and risk is particularly
important to avoid fundamental disagreements and misunderstandings,
particularly among councillors serving as Guardians of the
Environment. An early step in the process outlined in this
workshop is problem formulation whereby councillors examine environmental
problems more closely to avoid mistaking the "real" problem for
a symptom or a solution.
|