Newsletter and Technical Publications
<The Councillor as Guardian of the Environment>
An
Essay and Workshop for Local Elected Leaders on Environmental Governance with
Emphasis on Adopting Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs) -
Training for Elected Leadership -
Part II - Workshop on the Councillor as Guardian of
the Environment - WORKSHOP -
WORKSHOP COMPONENTS
13.3 Exercise: ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM FINDING
| Time Required: 90 - 120 minutes |
This exercise is to provide a list of high priority local environmental
problems to serve as the basis for small group work throughout the
workshop.
There are two process options for this exercise. Option A is the
appropriate choice if participants have been asked to complete a
pre-workshop assignment and arrive at the workshop with completed
worksheets. Otherwise, choose option B.
Ask participants to review the worksheets they have completed as a
pre-workshop assignment and to select three problems from these worksheets
which they believe are now or may soon become significant hazards to the
local environment. In other words, the problems selected would represent
high priorities for resolution by the local authority. Suggest that
participants ask problem formulating questions like:
- Why is it a problem?
- What possible hazard does it represent?
- What might happen if nothing is done about it?
While participants are selecting priority problems from their
worksheets, print on a sheet of newsprint, in large letters, six to ten
environmental problem categories such as air pollution, solid waste
disposal, water supply, transportation, land use, housing, sewage
disposal, and so forth. Be prepared to add other categories if necessary.
When participants have selected their three problems, explain that they
will be working during the workshop in small groups of between five and
ten organized according to environmental problem categories. Present the
list of environmental problem categories, printed earlier on newsprint,
and ask participants if other categories should be added to the list. Ask
each participant to choose an environmental problem category which is
associated with one of the participant's high priority problems. Then
organize participants into small groups that correspond with their
selections.
| Trainers note: Some
environmental problem categories may be more popular than others. If so,
two or three small groups may be formed around the same one. It there
are too few participants interested in a category to create a group,
participants from other groups can be asked to switch if the category is
a priority for them. |
When participants have chosen the small groups in which they want to
work, assign each small group to a specific work area where they will be
meeting throughout the workshop. Suggest that participants, in their small
groups, take approximately one hour to share their problem priorities and
to agree on a specific aspect of the risk category to focus on during the
workshop. For example, a solid waste group might choose to focus attention
on problems related to the accumulation of solid waste in roadways rather
than those related to landfill overloading or vice versa. Specific
problems brought to the group by participants from their own local
authorities should be the basis for defining the focus of the small group.
| Trainers note: There may be a
tendency of participants to choose too broad a topic for their small
groups. During a field test of these materials, participants that began
with a focus on drainage later broadened the focus to include other
infrastructure problems. Caution participants to choose a narrow, more
manageable focus for their efforts, and to stick with the decision. |
There is an alternative process for assembling a list of local
environmental problems assuming you decided to omit the pre-workshop
assignment described previously or in the event participants arrive at the
workshop without having completed their worksheets. Option B makes use of
a well-known idea generating activity called the Nominal Group
Technique (NGT). Equipment and materials required for the NGT include
an easel and newsprint sheets, index cards or "post-it notes,"
if available, and masking tape.
Serving in a facilitator role, proceed as follows with the five step NGT
process:
Step 1: Write a statement like the following in large
letters on a sheet of newsprint to focus the group's attention:
What are the most relevant environmental problems currently facing
the community served by your local authority?
Step 2: Give participants four to five minutes to think
about the question and to print the relevant problems facing their
respective communities in concise, one sentence statements on index cards
or "post-it notes," if available, one statement per card.
Step 3: Ask for participants to tape their completed index
cards or "post-it notes" on a designated wall of the training
room .
Step 4: Allow ten minutes (depending on the size of the
group) for clarification of problem statements to prevent possible
misunderstanding.
| Trainers note: To keep things
moving along briskly, you might read each statement aloud, saying what
you think it means. Ask the participant who offered the
statement: "did I get it right?" and then ask other
participants: "does everyone understand the problem?" The
intent is to avoid long-winded explanations or invite unwanted debate. |
Step 5: The final step in the NGT is to reduce
the relatively long list of problem statements to a short list of
potentially high risk environmental hazards. Allow a few minutes for
participants to "brouse" along the wall where the cards
containing problem statements have been taped. Ask participants to review
the cards and select the three problems which each believes
represent the gravest threat to the local environment. Ask participants to
record their selections by placing a check mark (P) on the three cards
containing their choices. Problem statements with the most mentions are
top candidates for assignment to small groups for subsequent workshop
activities.
| Trainers note: When the number
of problems is quite large (e.g., over 30 problem statements),
participants can be asked to rank their choices 1, 2, 3. Weights can
then be assigned to the rankings (i.e., 1st choice =5 pts; 2nd choice =3
pts; 3rd choice =1 pt. To help participants make their choices you might
suggest the use of criteria as described above in option A. |
The formation of small groups can be based on the assignment of
participants who are interested in similar environmental problems to
appropriate environmental problem categories as described above in option
A.
|