|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Forum on the Caspian, Aral and Dead Seas-Perspective
of Water Environmental Management and Politics>
<Symposium on the Aral Sea and The Surrounding Region
-Irrigated Agriculture and the Environment>
Irrigation Management on Paddy Based Agriculture in the
Deltas of the Aral Sea Basin
Yoshihiko Ogino, Hiroyuki Takaishi (University of
Osaka Prefecture),
Hiroki Ohue (Ehime University) and Kyoichi Otsuki (Tottori
University)
1. Irrigation Management Situation in Paddy Areas in the Deltas of the
Aral Sea Basin
In order to study irrigation management problems associated with paddy based
crop rotation system, the following three cases were picked out for each river
basin, namely, the deltas of the Ili river (Akhadara region), Syrdarya (Kzyl
Orda), and Amu Dar'ya (Nukus).
1.1 Case 1: Bakhbaktie State Farm (Ili river basin)
The Bakhbaktie state farm was planned for reclamation in the period when
Khunaev was first secretary of Kazakhstan in 1966. When the Kapchagai dam was
completed in 1970, the state farm started to run with 5,000 settlements in 8,400
ha farm lands.
(1) The Typical Crop Rotation System
The standard crop rotation system based on rice farming system is as follows;
2 years rice + 1 year mixed sowing barley and alfalfa + 2 years alfalfa + 1 year
rice + 1 year fallow (not normally but temporarily depending on soil salinity
condition). Rice is cultivated 3 times in every 7 to 8 years, which means 3/7.5,
that is, rice is cultivated 40% over the total acreage of farm land. In fact in
the state farm, rice is cultivated in 2,800 ha over the total irrigated farm
land of 6,726 ha which is equivalent to 41.6%.
(2) Irrigation Coefficient
The irrigation coefficient is defined as the ratio of the acreage of actual
irrigated land to total farm acreage of the state farm, so in this case the
value is 0.8.
(3) Water Requirements
Official documents state that water requirement for rice is 35,000 m3/ha
per year, and for barley and others it is 7,500 m3/ha in a year. But
in fact, with water amounting to 40,000 to 50,000 m3/ha per year, no
other crops than rice, such as barley and alfalfa, are irrigated at all. These
crops other than rice are supplied with water from ground water in a form of
subsurface irrigation. Massive water supply to rice (after land is cropped with
non-rice crops such as barley and alfalfa) is necessary to leach away salts
accumulated during non-rice cropping period.
(4) Land Development Strategy and Waterlogging/Salinity Problems
When land was reclaimed along with irrigation canals and ditches, the land
located higher than the irrigation water level remained unreclaimed because
water supply to such land was impossible due to gravity. The land located in the
lower depression where drainage was not possible also remained unreclaimed due
to the fear of waterlogging and, consequently, soil salinization.
1.2 Case 2: Cherynizakh State Farm (Kzyl Orda, Syrdarya basin)
Reclamation works were completed in 1961 when the Kzyl Orda weir (maximum
discharge rate 450 m3/sec, service area 495,000 ha) was constructed.
Cherybizakh state farm was located on the left bank of the Syrdarya and the
irrigated area is 7,000 ha with a population of 4,000 (800 households).
(1) the crop rotation system is the same as in case 1. The acreage of rice
cultivation (2,755 ha) is about 40% of total irrigated lands (7,055 ha).
(2) irrigation coefficient is around 70%.
(3) water requirement is the same as in case 1.
According to irrigation managers (farmers), the purpose of irrigation is to
maintain a high ground water table (1.5 m below the ground surface) so that
moisture supply in the fields of non-rice crops such as barley and alfalfa is
possible
by subsurface irrigation with capillary action. However, during this process,
within two or three years, salts accumulate sufficiently to damage non-rice
crops on the soil surface so that really abundant water supply at the time of
paddy helps to leach away the accumulated salts from the surface soil. Such
process is repeated in the deltas.
1.3 Case 3: Nukus Collective Farm (Nukus, Amu Dar'ya Basin)
Nukus collective farm is located in the northern part of Nukus City with
100,000 ha of total farm land and a population of 50,000 today. The collective
farm has been reclaimed for the purpose of supplying foodstuff to the people
living in the Nukus City area since 1963.
(1) the crop rotation system is also the same as in case 1 and 2.
(2) irrigation coefficient is 45% of which the irrigated farm land is about
45,000 ha (rice is cultivated in 22,000 ha and upland crops in 23,000 ha).
(3) water requirement is 24,000 to 25,000 m3/ha in a year for
rice, 12,000 m3/ha in a year for cotton.
2. Water Balance Model of Paddy Based Crop Rotation System
2.1 Land Use Pattern
As mentioned above, high lands and low-lying depressions were not reclaimed
as irrigated lands at the time of land development, so that irrigation
coefficients range from some 50 to 75% in the deltas of the Aral Sea. Within the
irrigated lands, some 40% of total irrigated lands are cultivating rice and 60%
are for non-rice crops. For simplification, suppose that a state farm or
collective farm serves 10,000 ha of the total land which is divided into 2,400
ha of rice paddy and 3,600 ha of non-rice crops such as barley and alfalfa as
rice based farming system.
2.2 Irrigation Management
As operation and management by farmers in state farms, only paddy rice fields
are irrigated. Supposing that the amount of water applied to the rice paddy is
50,000 m3/ha in a year, ground water level rises up to 1.5 m below
from the soil surface. This ground water is available to irrigate noun-non-rice
crops. If an adjacent influence area of ground water is assumed to be 20% of
total land, then the acreage of the influence area is 2,000 ha.
2.3 Water Balance Sheet
The evapo-transpiration rate (ET) for each type of field is shown in column 2
in table 1, with an irrigation term of 100 days. Of the total 120 million m3
of water applied to the rice paddy, 24 M m3 is consumed in the paddy,
30 M m3 in non-paddy fields, 16 M m3 in others, 8 M m3
in the adjacent influence area of ground water, and the last 42 M m3
is held in the ground water respectively, as shown in column 4 in table 1. Water
application efficiency is defined as the ratio of consumptive use of water (ET)
to the total application of water, so the value is (24+30)/120=0.45 (45%). If
the water of 42 M m3 held in ground water is necessary to irrigate
non-rice crops, the value becomes in that case (24+30+42)/120=0.80 (80%). The 42
M m3 of water held in ground water is shared in equal depth of 420
mm.
Column 5 in table 1 shows the total depth (in mm) of consumptive water use in
each type of land uses. The conceptual model of paddy based crop rotation system
in the deltas of the Aral Sea basin is shown in figure.1.
By using the conceptual model for this kind of irrigation management in the
rice based agriculture in the deltas, improvement of irrigation management and
systems are concluded as follows.
Table 1. Water Balance Sheet
|
Type of lands
|
Acreage
|
Net-consumption (ET)
|
Gross-consumption
|
| |
ha
|
mm/day
|
M m3
|
mm/year
|
M m3/year
|
|
paddy
|
2,400
|
10
|
24
|
1,420
|
34
|
|
non-paddy
|
3,600
|
8
|
30
|
1,220
|
44
|
|
other uses
|
4,000
|
6
|
16
|
820
|
33
|
|
influence area
|
2,000
|
4
|
8
|
400
|
8
|
Total water supply 120 M m 3 Ground water supply 42 M m 3

Figure 1: Conceptual Model of Paddy Based Farming System
3. Conclusion
In the deltaic area in the Aral Sea Basin, rice is cultivated in rotation
with non-rice crops such as barley and alfalfa. In
an irrigation command, some 60% is cultivated and 40% is uncultivated as these
areas are too high to receive irrigation water by gravity or too low and
therefore would suffer from severe waterlogging and soil salinity. Within the
60% of irrigated cropped area, some 24% is planted with rice and 36% is planted
with non-rice crops in rotation with rice. The Actual irrigation practice is to
supply only irrigation water to rice fields which raise the ground water table
to be absorbed by non-rice crops. Virtually no surface irrigation water supply
is given to non-rice crops.
Water applied to rice fields raises the ground water table in the entire
area, covering even non-agricultural areas amounting to 40% of the total command
area. The ground water table adjacent to the command area is also raised. This
means that the irrigation water supply to rice fields is consumed by non-rice
crops in the form of sub-irrigation, as well as it is consumed in
non-agricultural and adjacent areas.
Abundant water supply (approximately 500 mm) is needed for rice areas during
the initial period of rice cultivation after rotation to non-rice crop has
finished, for leaching accumulated salts during non-rice cropping periods. To
improve irrigation (water application) efficiency the following measures are
considered effective:
1) To reclaim non cropped areas (amounting to some 40% of entire irrigation
command) where the ground water table
is raised high enough to promote evaporation loss. For this purpose, however,
proper land leveling and drainage system must be implemented.
2) To introduce proper surface irrigation practices for non-rice crops (e.g.,
furrow irrigation) to avoid reliance on water supply from ground water table
which is raised by water supplied to rice crops. As farmers are not used to such
irrigation practices, it may take considerable time to modify the irrigation
practice.
3) Under the current irrigation practice, massive irrigation supply to rice
crops appears to be necessary as:
i) accumulated salt should be leached away,
ii) water is supplied to non-rice crops from raised ground water table. It is
highly desirable, however, to examine ways and means to increase irrigation
efficiency, including reducing irrigation water supply and water losses during
water delivery.
References:
Tsutsui, Hikaru; World Irrigation IV. Irrigation and Development -
Aral Sea Basin in Central Asia. Jour. Irr. Engr. Rural Planning, No. 26. 1994.
Tsutsui, Hikaru; Academic Research Programme for Arid Land Study,
Seminar of the Aral Crisis 2nd GIF/UNU Meeting on Environmental Management of
the Aral Sea Region, 1993.
Zhu, Zhongping and Paul Raskin; Integrated Water Planning: the Case of
the Aral Sea, Seminar of the Aral Crisis 2nd GIF/UNU Meeting on Environmental
Management of the Aral Sea Region, 1993.
Zonn, Igor, Michael H. Glantz, and Alvin Rubinstein; The Virgin Scheme
in the former Soviet Union.
Program of Concrete Actions on Improvement of Ecological Situation in the
Aral Sea Basin for the Nearest 3 to 5 Years with Regard for Social and Economic
Development of the Region (Fundamentals).
Concept of SPA SANIIRI on the Solving of Aral Region Problem under the Social
and Economic Development of Central Asian Republics, (Scientific - Production
Association Central Asian Research Institute of Irrigation, SPA SANIIRI.
Smith, David R. (Environmental and Social Impacts of Group, National
Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado); Climate Change, Climate
Variability, and Ecosystem Decline in the Deltas of the Aral Sea Basin.
Zonn, Igor, (1989 Academic Press Limited); An activity-based systems
concept of anthropogenic desertification.
Zonn, Igor, Concise Terminology Dictionary of the Desertification
Problems, Ashghabat 1994 Chief Editor Acad. A. Babaev, Turkmen Academy of
Sciences Desert Institute.
Glantz, M. and Igor S. Zonn; The Karakumdarya - River in the Desert,
1994 Boulder.
Glantz, Michael H., Alvin Z. Rubinstein and Igor S. Zonn; Tragedy in
the Aral Sea basin - Looking back to plan ahead?
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) USSR Commission for UNEP,
Arid Land Development and the Combat Against Desertification: An Integrated
Approach, Moscow 1986.
|