|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Forum on the Caspian, Aral and Dead
Seas-Perspective of Water Environmental Management and Politics>
<Symposium on the Aral Sea and The Surrounding Region -Irrigated
Agriculture and the Environment>
The Problem of Agricultural Crop Diversity in the
Lower Part of the Syrdarya Basin
Leonid. N. Dmitriev Chief Engineer,
Design Institute "Kazgiprovodkhoz"
1. The complicated ecological-economic situation in the Aral Sea basin
is already well known around the world. The water resources of the
Amudarya and Syrdarya rivers are almost depleted. The ecopattern
consisting of the sea itself, delta and flood plain lands with the
existing large water diversion from river, is doomed to total
disappearance. The Amudarya and Syrdarya rivers in their middle and low
currents have turned into collectors for mineralized and contaminated
sewage and drained waters from the cities and irrigated fields and became
of little use for farming and drinking purposes.
The governments of the five states - the Republics of Kazakhstan,
Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kirgizia and Tajikistan - considered joint
endeavors in water resources use and conservation improvement to be
necessary. An Interstate Council, executive committee and other
coordinating bodies have been established. Some seven programs for study
and research of optimal solutions of the occurred problem were elaborated
together with the World Bank. Namely, the common strategy of water
resources use and conservation in the basin is supposed to be worked out,
to improve the registration and quality of water; to regenerate the water
aquariums in the northern part of the Aral Sea and Syrdarya and Amudarya
rivers deltas; to increase the channel capacity of the Syrdarya for big
floods from Chardarinski water reservoir into the northern aquariums of
the Aral Sea; to construct collectors for the drained saline water
discharge from the irrigated areas into the sea; to improve the farming
and drinking water supply of the cities and settlements; and to create an
additional network of meteorological stations. The creation of common
information patterns and regional water resources management means is
stipulated. The first sitting of the representatives of the five states on
elaboration of national and regional strategies in water resources and
conservation took place in February this year. These actions inspire the
people with hope to improve the ecological and economic situation in the
region.
Nevertheless, the major point of this problem is the search for water
saving reserves with simultaneous improvement of water resources use
efficiency, cropping pattern selection and technology as well as
agricultural crops yield increase. Agricultural and water saving problems
in the Syrdarya downstream in Kzyl-Ordinskaya area of the Republic of
Kazakhstan are being considered further.
2. All the main arable lands of the Kzyl-Ordinskaya area are located in
the Syrdarya basin and are irrigated by the water from this river.
The main agricultural direction of the land use is paddy cultivation,
which started being developed in the second half of this century. For
1960-1993 the irrigated area in the area increased from 90,000 to 287,000
ha due to engineering rice growing pattern construction. At present about
180,000 ha of lands are under rice rotation, other areas covering about
84,000 ha are used for fodder rotations, 10,000 are allocated for
vegetables and melons. A number of serious problems have come to light
over the years as a result of arable land use. The major problems are as
follows:
- for the last 30 years water mineralization in the Syrdarya
irrigation source increased from 0.4-0.6 g/l to 1.3-2.0 g/l;
- land salinity processes became widely pervasive covering an area of
150,000 ha. This process is going on because of insufficient drainage,
increased irrigation water salinity, reduction in expenditure for
clearing of drainage system etc.. Depending on the amout of water in the
river, salt accumulation amounts to 1-5 tons per ha.
- Rice-cultivation orientation in the agricultural activity in the area
requires enormous amounts of water diversion from the river, which
results in:
a) on the background of total water resources reduction in the basin
some negative irrevocable ecological degradation processes are taking
place;
b) despite the great potential capacities of irrigated lands, the
population in the area have to face shortages in food products such as:
meat - 85%, milk - 52%, eggs - 60%, vegetables - 38%, potatoes - 23%.
Although paddy yield for the 1965-1985 period has doubled and reached 5.5
t/ha, other crops yields is extremely poor: Lucerne - 5.0 t/ha, wheat
- 3.0t/ha, Soya - 0.8 t/ha, maize for grain - 3.0 t/ha.
Due to the above mentioned and other reasons it has become an absolute
necessity to cut rice cropping area at least for minimal restoration of
environmental balance in the region as well as for its economy upheaval.
3. The available submitted proposals on cutting the rice cropping area
and increasing the efficiency of irrigated land use are contradictory and
are as follows:
(a) The Local Kzyl-Ordinski Scientific-Research Institute considers it
necessary to undertake the following:
- to reduce the number of paddy fields in a six-field crop rotation
pattern from 3 to 2, i.e. to assume the total area under rice will not
exceed 33.3%; or to save the existing crop pattern with 50% of paddy on
one portion of land introducing non-rice crop patterns on the remaining
part.
- due to regional ecological state deterioration, it is advisable to
minimize (or exclude totally) weed-killing chemicals and mineral
fertilizers use; o
- make abundant use of perennial in crop rotation pattern;
(b) DAI Inc.(USA) has proposed a preliminary concept of a cropping
strategy for the area. Its key statements are as follows:
- shifting of emphasis from rice to other crops;
- irrigation and drainage system perfection;
- agro-industry development.
With due account to local reclamation conditions, agricultural crops
adaptation to continental climate and its value increase in perennial
grasses processing, DAI has considered an exhaustive list of competitive
non-rice crops giving preliminary assessment to their advantages and
disadvantages. From their point of view the oil-containing crops such as
sunflower, safflower, rape and soya beans in combination with fodder
sorghum, maize and some other grain crops are considered to be the most
beneficial crops especially after processing. The proposal stipulates
construction of a special oil refinery. In this case rice is supposed to
be cultivated as a monoculture on heavier and less drained soils.
(c) Some specialists from the Harza company (USA) also stick to the idea
of rice cultivation in a one-crop pattern, which is acknowledged in many
countries of Southeast Asia and America. In the majority of these
countries rice growing is practiced predominantly in warm zones with plus
temperatures in winter. It provides a favorable opportunity to have a
second harvest of non-rice agricultural crops. That is why rice growing in
these countries as mono-crop pattern is rather conditional.
(d) Specialists at the Design Institute "Kazgiprovodkhoz" have
given their consideration to this question in their feasibility study
report and came to the conclusion that: introduction of rice monoculture
presents by itself a fairly tempting alternative. However the local
scientists expertise has not given any positive results in this particular
problem. It resulted in intensive soil swamping, abundant growth of
hydrophilous weeds control which presents certain difficulties;
considerable rice yield decrease and greater need for fertilizers,
particularly nitrates, as well as pesticides and herbicides. Consequently
it resulted in more intensive pollution of drainage water. Besides 65% of
the crop growing area would be non-rice area. This means that under
conditions of insufficient soil drainability and high irrigation water
salinity it becomes necessary to develop an artificial drainage system
with an intensity of 70-300 m/ha. This will require considerable
additional investment in the construction of drainage systems with water
pumping, power supply network development and maintenance services.
These investments depending on the local natural resources can amount to
US$250 million throughout the whole irrigated area within Kzyl-Ordinskaya
area. Even if the rice yield is high enough, the implementation of this
idea will be hampered by shortage of funds.
That is why the Design Institute "Kazgiprovodkhoz" reviewed
the well known idea of occasional fresh ground water formation by
periodical rice growing. The essence of this concept is based on rice with
non-rice crops rotation. For this particular purpose the whole area under
rice-crop rotation pattern (600-1,000 ha) is sown with rice and flooded
with water. As rice is cultivated simultaneously on all the fields of the
crop rotation area there are minimum under ground water and salts flowing
from one field to another, that has place in the traditional crop rotation
pattern. Salt disposal from the soil layer occurs and fresh water cushion
is formed during rice vegetation period with insignificant soil
drainability increase at the expense of additional construction and
drainage network deepening. During the two subsequent years non-rice crops
are cultivated in the mentioned lands which consume moisture through
regular irrigation and partially from desalinated ground water.
Afterwards, two-year rice growing is resumed. As it was pointed out, such
3-year cycle provides rice production of 33.3% per rotation and up-land
crops of 66.3%. The choice of the up-land crops should be determined by
perspective long-term orientation of the farm. At present the farmers of
the area are growing rice, animal feeds and produce cattle breeding
products. Evidently, to provide the population of the area with required
food items the mentioned specialization by the majority of farmers should
be preserved. It seems to be expedient to replace fodder crops such as
maize and lucerne by more salt-tolerant species like sorghum and sweet
clover. If required, cultivation of maize and lucerne may be continued in
small quantities on well-drained lands. From irrigation and economic point
of view oil-containing plants cultivation is worth considering. This
specialization alternative ought to be tentative and thoroughly tested on
pilot fields.
4. Water saving is achieved mainly through two factors in all the
proposals - paddy sown area reduction and water loss prevention caused by
underground water flowing from paddy fields to the neighboring fields
after crop harvesting. According to preliminary estimates, reduction of
rice sown area by 20,000 ha (from 80,000 to 60,000) will result in a
saving of fresh water of approximately 300 million m3, while under ground
water flowing prevention during the post-harvest period will save 150
million m3. The latter effect is achieved mainly through introducing rice
monoculture 3-fields crop rotation with large fields.
5. Specialists at the Design Institute "Kazgiprovodkhoz" also
have done some economic evaluations of the required capital investments
for growing rice as a monocrop and for other above mentioned alternatives.
All the comparative values are shown in Appendix 1. Proceeding from these
evaluations it turns out that 1 ha reconstruction costs for three
alternatives are as follows (in US $)
- rice as monoculture - $2,508
- large 3 fields crop rotation pattern with 33.3% of rice area - $950
- existing crop rotation pattern in the area - 66.7% and non-rice crop
pattern in the remaining area (33.3%) - $1797
Judging from these data, it is considered that the cheapest alternative
is large 3 fields crop rotation pattern with rice area of 33.3%. The main
expenses in the rice monoculture alternative are the high cost of the
drainage system construction for upland crop area. Analysis data show that
due to the diversity of hydrogeological conditions of the region, drainage
construction volumes and consequently its costs in different areas will
considerably differ from one locality to another: in the lower parts of
basin the cost will be greater than in upper parts.
6. The above mentioned preliminary estimate data cannot be considered
sufficient in alternative choices for the following reasons: scarcity of
previous study of the natural conditions such as water conductivity of the
major acquires, updated components of water and salt balance in the
irrigated fields; and almost no experience in cultivation of alternative
crops such as sorghum, safflower etc.. Arrangement as well as undertaking
natural experimental work and simulation modeling are required for optimal
solution choice.
7. Visual soil surveys were carried out and three crop-rotation were
chosen for experimental purposes in the two state farms located in the
upper part of the Kzyl-Ordinsky left-bank irrigated massif (30-60 km from
Kzyl-Orda) with a total area of 2865 ha. Cultivation of paddy as mono crop
is envisaged for plot No 1 in the area totaling 987 ha, up-land crops
cultivation with intensive drainage system construction for plot No 5 (810
ha), rice rotation with other agricultural crops for three years, one of
which is intended for rice sowing on the whole plot area No 6 (1069 ha).
8. The tentative costs for construction works are estimated for the
plots mentioned (list of works is given in the Appendix No 1) and are as
follows:
- plot No 1 - US$0.55 million
- plot No 5 - US$2.80 million
- plot No 6 - US$1.02 million
The total capital investments amount to US$4.37 million. The design
survey cost is approximately US$350,000.
9. It is expedient to carry out complex scientific research,
reclamation, hydrogeological, water management, design with elaboration of
mathematical models on the above mentioned plots if money is available for
these purposes.
APPENDIX: Reconstruction Costs per 1000 ha of Irrigated Area for
Three Alternatives of Decreasing Rice Cultivation Area (Thousand US$)
|
NAME |
RICE MONOCULTURE |
LARGE 3
FIELDS
CROP
ROTATION |
EXISTING CROP ROTATION
PATTERN ON THE AREA 66.7%
AND NON-RICE CROP PATTERN
ON THE REST AREA (33.3%) |
|
|
rice mono culture
333 ha
|
non-rice crop pattern
667 ha |
total
1000ha
|
pattern with 33.3% of rice area
1000ha |
rice pattern
667 ha
|
non-rice crop pattern
333 ha
|
total
1000ha
|
|
Clearing irrigation canals |
3.7 |
- |
3.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Deepening and clearing of collectors and drainage |
12.9 |
136.7 |
149.6 |
34.7 |
23.1 |
68.2 |
91.3 |
|
Construction of tail falls |
79.2 |
18.0 |
97.2 |
286.2 |
190.9 |
10.0 |
200.9 |
|
Installation of movable pump station |
- |
136.8 |
136.8 |
- |
- |
68.3 |
68.3 |
|
Additional outlets from check to drains |
49.4 |
101.6 |
151.0 |
185.3 |
123.6 |
50.8 |
174.4 |
|
Additional outlets from dishes to riice check |
42.1 |
173.0 |
215.1 |
315.0 |
210.1 |
86.5 |
296.6 |
|
Construction of drainage |
- |
1542.2 |
1542.2 |
- |
- |
771.2 |
771.2 |
|
Concrete lining of irrigation canals |
- |
124.8 |
124.8 |
- |
- |
62.4 |
62.4 |
|
Leveling of cheks |
- |
88.1 |
88.1 |
132.0 |
88.0 |
44.0 |
132.0 |
|
TOTAL
Per 1 ha |
187.3
0.56 |
232.1
3.48 |
2508.4
2.51 |
953.2
0.95 |
635.7
0.95 |
1161.4
3.48 |
1797.1
1.797 |
|