|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Planning and Management of Lakes and
Reservoirs: An Integrated Approach to Eutrophication>
CHAPTER 5: ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF EUTROPHICATION
5.3. Sources and Impacts of Eutrophication
5.3.1. Economic Sources of Eutrophication (Backward Linkages)
Nutrients are supplied to a lake by drainage from its catchment and
direct rainfall. Focusing on the two nutrients important for
eutrophication, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), it is necessary to
distinguish between natural sources of eutrophication and artificial
sources or what is known as cultural eutrophication. Eutrophication that
is induced by human activity, beyond natural levels, is known as cultural
eutrophication. Table 5.2. presents some of the sources of cultural
eutrophication.
Natural sources of nitrogen and phosphorus are derived from background
nutrient cycles and biogeochemical processes, where the primary sources
include nutrients in the soil and atmospheric input. Phosphorus and
nitrogen deposition through rainfall includes natural particulate matter,
such as pollen, dust, and soil particles etc., as well as chemical
products from economic activities. Some of these can be from sources far
away from the receiving watershed. Human activities have affected
atmospheric input of nitrogen more than that of phosphorus, as many such
activities emit nitrogen products into long-range atmospheric circulation
patterns. Combustion of fossil fuels in industrial and energy production
and in transportation is an important source of gaseous oxides of
nitrogen. Average atmospheric phosphorus deposition in the United States
and Europe in 1988 was estimated to be 430 g total of phosphorus per
hectare per year (P/ha/year). The lowest levels were around 50 P/ha/year,
which may reflect background levels, which are otherwise hard to measure
directly. Nitrogen deposition is at least an order of magnitude higher,
between 2 and 10 kg of nitrogen per hectare per annum (N/ha/year).
Table 5.2. Sources of cultural
eutrophication.
| Source |
Type of problem |
| Point Sources |
|
Power plants |
Combustion of fossil fuels emit nitrogen
products into the atmosphere, which are carried down by rainfall and
other processes, causing eutrophication in water bodies |
| Sewage Treatment Plants |
Treatment process releases oxides of N and
P in effluents, which drain into water bodies |
| Industrial Plants |
Industrial processes release N and P
products in effluents, which drain into water bodies |
| Non-Point Sources |
|
Agriculture |
Farming practices, including use of fertilisers rich in
N and P, deposit increased amounts of these nutrients in the soil.
Run-off from these farms cause eutrophication in water bodies |
| Sewage |
Direct discharge of sewage from domestic sources, not
connected to treatment plants, will eventually make its way into water
bodies |
Both nitrogen and phosphorus are also found naturally in
soils, predominantly as organic compounds and run-off into lakes contain
both elements. Concentrations of these nutrients are, however, higher
where, for economic reasons, agricultural activities have added nitrogen
and phosphate containing compounds into the soil. This kind of cultural
eutrophication is often the main cause of poor water quality in lakes.
When considering cultural eutrophication, it is useful to
distinguish between point and non-point sources of nutrients. Point
sources include discharges from industry and domestic wastewater treatment
plants as well as agricultural point sources such as confined livestock
units. Non-point or diffuse sources include excess run-off from
development, silviculture and agriculture. Point sources of pollution are
easier to identify and it is easier to design policies to reduce pollution
from point sources than from non-point sources. Non-point sources, by the
very nature of the problem, are harder to monitor and measure, as that
involves dealing with a large number of agents. It is also costly to
design programs to reduce pollution from non-point sources, where
enforcement is very difficult.
Non-point sources of silt, organic matter and nutrients are
often the largest cause of eutrophication around the world, primarily from
agricultural activities. In the U.S. threatened or impaired uses of most
lakes and reservoirs are associated with non-point sources. Intensive
agricultural practices use nitrogen and phosphorus containing fertilisers
and pesticides, which show up in the run-off. The quantities of nutrient
loss depend on various factors including farming practice, nature and
amount of fertiliser applied, density of domestic animals, soil type, soil
drainage and rainfall. Some of these may vary with season and from year to
year. Nitrogen losses increase with intensity of land use and with
artificial additions more than those of phosphorus. This is due to the
greater mobility of soluble nitrogen compounds. However, water logging
makes phosphorus more soluble. Thus, unless there is heavy soil erosion or
water logging, phosphorus losses from intensive farming are generally
lower than nitrogen losses. Nitrate concentrations in waters have
increased significantly in many countries since the 1960s, primarily due
to the use of synthetic nitrogen fertilisers.
Sewage treatment plants are point sources of high
concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus. These facilities typically use
bacterial oxidation of organic matter, which reduces pollution. However,
this process oxidises all major elements in the waste, including nitrogen
and phosphorus, which are then solubilized, and are found in high
concentrations in the effluents from the plants. Household detergents,
often with high phosphate content, also add to the nutrients in sewage
effluents. Industrial effluents and storm water run-off from urban areas
can also add to the increased nutrient concentration. Industries with high
nutrient levels include those processing foodstuffs, such as breweries,
canneries and sugar refineries, and those with metal finishing processes,
which use phosphorus solutions.
In summary, efforts to slow or reverse eutrophication of
freshwater systems generally confront the need to reduce inputs of
nutrients. The easiest sources of nutrients to monitor and regulate are
point sources, particularly municipal sewage treatment facilities and
industrial discharges. However, non-point and airborne sources account for
significant loading. These sources are much more difficult to contain. An
economically efficient strategy for reducing nutrient input would first
tackle the sources for which abatement plus oversight costs are least.
This is likely to involve a combination of demanding expectations for
abatement by point sources and more pragmatic, simple measures for
non-point sources.
|