|
|
 |
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Planning and Management of Lakes and
Reservoirs: An Integrated Approach to Eutrophication>
CHAPTER 3. POLICY, INSTITUTIONAL, AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
3.5. Institutional Framework
3.5.4. Some Key Issues Concerning Institutional Organization for
Eutrophication Management.
Role of the State
The principles of sustainable development of the United Nations
Conference on Environmental Development, which deepened and updated those
of the Stockholm Conference in 1972, found a great number of developing
countries in the process of installing market economy models in which the
leading role of the State in planning the economic and social development
became less relevant or completely disappeared.
At the same time, the need for regulatory frameworks to ensure common
interest social objectives and the protection of user rights appeared
while transferring developing initiatives to the private sector.
Presently, without abandoning said models, it is recognized that the State
should recover the capacity to enforce strategic indicative planning and
to establish the "rules of the game" to be observed by private,
and even government owned enterprises, particularly in the field of public
services.
With regard to State's institutional organization, although a
considerable degree of centralization of activity is desirable at the
planning stage of management, a high degree of decentralization is usually
desirable during implementation, particularly when many water and land
resource users are involved.
Therefore, the responsibility for the implementation of projects and the
operation of systems, particularly in water supply and sanitation
programs, should be delegated to all administrative levels down to the
community and individuals served. The utilization of the skills and
potential of non-governmental organizations should also be promoted, as
well as the private sector and local people, taking into account the
strategies and public's interests in water resources.
Administration of water rights, economic incentives, regulations on
pollution, and erosion control or groundwater withdrawals are often best
accomplished through water- or land-use organizations.
Role of Private Sector
In many countries, economic policies launched during the last decade
have induced a shift from the "Government being the provider of water
services" to its "being the creator and regulator of an
environment that allows involvement of communities, the private sector and
non-government organizations in the provision of water supply and
sanitation services, as well as in the development and utilization of
water in other sectors of the economy".
On the other hand, decentralization of operational responsibilities and
the establishment of well-structured regulatory frameworks can be useful
tools to improve the functioning of public services, even when operated by
public enterprises. These involve the need to devote great efforts in
capacity building and institutional strengthening, according to the
ongoing experiences in LAC countries.
Box 3.6 presents a brief description of the progress achieved in
LAC countries regarding the privatization of their water supply and sewage
treatment systems. Although promising, the experience is developing slowly
in the water management sector where major opportunities will be available
as long as decentralization of government operated public services and the
implementation of regulatory frameworks and agencies take place.
Complementary, the introduction of water markets and pricing mechanisms
can encourage the private sector to play an increasingly important role in
providing the necessary financial resources and management skill needed
for the successful development and utilization of the resources.
Box 3.6 Privatization of Water Related Public Services:
Experiences in LAC and Argentina (Progress in the Privatization
of Water Related Public Service, 1998).
The participation of
the private sector in LAC countries is still in its initial stage in the
majority of the countries, and the public sector is still administrating
the major part of the infrastructure. Some examples concerning water
supply and sanitation services are found, mainly in Argentina, where the
responsibility for some large systems has been transferred to private
enterprises. In the rest of the countries, the private sector is
participating by means of small companies and subcontracting. Major
progresses have been achieved in the electric energy sector,
particularly in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Peru.
Private
participation is still incipient in the region when water related public
services are considered, and therefore the experience of private
participation in their administration is quite limited in terms of time
and space and, although promising, it cannot be generalized to the whole
region. Larger experience exist, although more limited in scope, with
private participation in operational activities by means of service
contracts. These involve maintenance of facilities and infrastructure,
invoicing, consulting for the design and supervision of the construction
of facilities, and even the administration of systems. This kind of
participation obviously does not represent the same challenge as the
transfer of responsibilities by concession or sale.
Concession
is the mechanism adopted by countries to privatize the operation and
maintenance of water-related public services, although in some cases
governments are considering the sale of part of the shares of public
water supply enterprises. Some countries are allowing private
investments in the expansion of public services systems, particularly in
the case of electricity generation. It is also becoming more frequent in
the case of small water supply and sanitation facilities, such as high
level resorts. The lack of a regulatory framework has limited, to some
extent, the privatization of public services. As long as the service is
provided by the government, such a framework has not been considered
necessary. This concept is now changing. In most cases regulatory
frameworks have been issued on an enterprise basis. This has occurred in
Argentina, where each province has it own regulatory competence. Lack of
previous experience and very short learning time had been the main
difficulties faced by the staff in regulatory agencies.
Regarding
irrigation, the management, maintenance, and operation of most systems
in the region have been transferred to the users since 1990. Even minor
or secondary infrastructures have been transferred to them, while major
facilities continue to be under public sector control. Chile is the only
country where, in some irrigation systems, users control all the
management process, including river water diversion, demanding large
investments in control structures.
The opening of
water-related public services to private participation has created many
and varied opportunities for investment. Directly purchased or
concession arrangements, management contracts by specialized firms, and
subcontracting of partial services will provide a variety of options.
Decentralization of government-operated public services will create a
large market for private service providers.
Starting in 1989,
Argentina launched in-depth economic reform in conjunction with
decentralization of many activities, including their transfer to the
provinces and a privatization program of the largest scope in the
region. Water supply and sanitation services in Buenos Aires, as well as
a major part of energy sector facilities, have been privatized by the
federal government up to date. Some provinces have also privatized the
water supply systems of major cities or are in their process of
privatization. Sectoral and global regulatory agencies have been created
at national and provincial levels to monitor the compliance of the
regulatory frameworks by the public and private enterprises in charge of
public services and solve conflicts with users. |
|
 |
|