|
|
 |
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Sourcebook
of Alternative Technologies for Freshwater Augumentation in Some
Countries in Asia>
5.10 Drip Irrigation - India
Introduction
Drip irrigation is of recent origin, and, in India, is being used on a
limited scale in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra States,
mainly for coconut, coffee, grape and vegetable production. Drip
irrigation systems (DIS) are extremely effective in arid and drought prone
areas where water is scarce, and have been used experimentally in India
for over 15 years: in the States of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Maharashtra,
and Andhra Pradesh, progressive farmers started using this method of
irrigation in the late-1970s without the benefit of any subsidies or
support from central or state governments. However, as a result of
subsequent, sustained efforts by the state and central governments,
agricultural universities, and private sector manufacturers, use of drip
irrigation systems spread through the drought prone areas of southern and
western India. The use of DIS, however, is primarily to irrigate high
value, horticultural crops. In states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, and
Tamil Nadu, DIS are sometimes used for irrigation of vegetable and other
commercial crops. The sharp rise in the area under DIS irrigation between
1988 and 1989 is due, in large part, to the significant increase in the
use of these systems in the Maharashtra State.
Technical Description
Drip irrigation systems deliver water and agrochemicals (e.g.,
fertilizers and pesticides) directly to the root zones of the irrigated
plants at a rate best suited to meet the needs of the plants being
irrigated. Thus, this system makes efficient use of water, especially when
compared to conventional methods of irrigation such as furrow, border,
basin and sprinkler irrigation systems, which, under arid and drought
conditions, suffer from an high rate of water loss and have a low degree
of water use efficiency.
Extent of Use
Drip irrigation systems are used throughout the arid parts of India,
especially in Maharashtra, Haryana, Meghalaya, and Rajasthan. At Rahuri,
in Maharashtra State, the use of drip irrigation of pomegranates, grown in
gravely soils, resulted in a savings of about 44 cm of irrigation water,
or 44%, over the conventional check basin irrigation systems previously
used, as shown in Table 43. The water use efficiency was also much higher
using the drip method of irrigation, especially when combined with the use
of mulch, which effected a further savings of irrigation water of 14% when
compared to un-mulched plots. Similarly, at Dapoli in the Konkan Region of
Maharashtra State, where, despite an annual rainfall of about 4 000 mm,
the period between December and May is often a time of severe drought,
drip irrigation systems were used to irrigate mango and cashew crops. The
soils of the Region are highly porous laterites, which are poorly suited
to supporting conventional, pond-fed irrigated agriculture, particularly
of row crops. Nevertheless, the Region has an high potential for the
production of crops like mangoes and cashews. However, to establish mango
or cashew orchards, it is essential to provide adequate water during the
first two to three years after transplanting the seedlings, which, during
the dry season, can only be supplied through irrigation. In the mango
orchards, an indigenously designed drip irrigation system was installed
using a common, earthen pitcher placed at an higher elevation than the
plants and a siphon to direct the water to the trees by means of two to
three drippers per stem. This system helped to quickly establish the
orchards, with a considerable savings in irrigation water compared to
prevalent practice of hand watering the trees. As shown in Table 44, there
was also substantial improvement in plant growth, as measured by height,
girth, and plant spread, using drip irrigation compared to the
conventional hand watering method. The application of about 45
l/plant/week of water appeared optimal.
In Haryana and Rajasthan States, drip irrigation of potatoes grown in
loamy sand soils at Jobner, of onions, sugar beets, and potatoes grown in
sandy loam soils at Hissar, and of bhindi and sugarcane grown in clay
soils at Rahuri (clay soil) resulted in improved crop yields and a savings
in irrigation water of between 18% and 40%, except at Jobner where few
differences were apparent between irrigation methods used. Nevertheless,
there was substantial improvement in the water use efficiency of the crops
at all three centres.
TABLE 43. Yield of Pomegranates Using Different
Irrigation Methods on Gravel Soils.

TABLE 44. Effect of Drip Irrigation on the Growth of
Mango Plants.

Similarly, at Hissar, the use of drip irrigation systems supplied with
irrigation water from a poor quality source (having an electrical
conductivity of 6.5 mmhos/cm) resulted in only a 12% decrease in the yield
of radishes using drip irrigation compared to surface irrigation methods
using the same poor quality source water, which resulted in a decrease in
yield of 39.5%. Even under these conditions, water use efficiency
increased almost threefold with drip irrigation compared to conventional
surface irrigation techniques as shown in Table 46. A well-managed drip
irrigation system supports the use of poor quality of water because the
irrigation water is applied continuously, ensuring that the root zone does
not dry out and that the salts move away from the root zone. Thus, the
accumulated salt is leached to the edge of the wetted soil mass where it
does not interfere with the growth of the plants. Also, since a much
smaller quantity of water is applied to the soil, the total salt load
applied is likewise lower.
TABLE 45. Yield of Radishes Using Drip Irrigation.
| Irrigation method |
Canal water |
Poor quality water |
| Root yield (q) |
Water Use Efficiency (q/ha/cm) |
Root yield (q) |
Water Use Efficiency (q/ha/cm) |
| Surface |
163.5 |
13.7 |
98.9 |
8.7 |
| Drip |
268.1 |
29.8 |
236.0 |
26.2 |
TABLE 46. Yield of Brinjals Using a Salt Water Drip
Irrigation System.
| Salinity (ppm) |
Conductivity (mmhos/cm) |
Salinity ( at 10 cm depth and 10 cm away from root
zone) |
Salinity (at 20 cm depth and 20 cm away from root
zone) |
Yield (kg/ha) |
| 850 |
660 |
21 |
361 5 |
250 |
| 2 500 |
1 680 |
19 |
110 |
5 127 |
| 7 500 |
3 290 |
27 |
129 |
4 738 |
| 10 000 |
4 500 |
558 |
180 |
4 122 |
In Meghalaya, some of the tribal farmers use a drip
irrigation system constructed of bamboo to irrigate betel, pepper and
arecanut crops. The system is indigenously designed using locally
available materials. The hillsides on which this system is used have a
rock and soil mixture with poor water holding and retention capacities
that require frequent applications of irrigation water. Using this system,
water from natural stream is diverted at a point of higher elevation than
the plot to be irrigated, and is conveyed by gravity through bamboo
channels, supported on ground surface by wooden or bamboo supports, to the
point of application. The discharge at the head channel varies from 15 to
20 l/min and is reduced to between 10 and 30 drops/min at the point of
irrigation water application. The elevation of the head channel may be up
to a few metres higher than the irrigated field elevation, whereas the
elevation of the last channel may be less than 10 cm to 15 cm above the
ground surface.
At Jobner in Rajasthan, earthen pitchers and porous cups have been used
successfully for irrigating vegetable crops, such as crops of cabbage,
cauliflower, and knolkhol. The technique uses earthen cups of 500 ml
capacity embedded in the soil at the site of the seedlings. The cups are
filled to the brim with water at intervals of 4 to 5 days. Because of
their underground situation, the cups experience little water loss due
deep percolation and/or evaporation. At Karnal, using a similar
technology, earthen pitchers of about 15 l capacity have been used for
irrigating cucumbers and radishes. This technology provides irrigation
water to the crops at a rate of less than 2 cm/ha. These innovative
technologies permit the cultivation of vegetables and cash crops in areas
where it is not practical or possible to grow crops using conventional
surface irrigation methods.
Operation and Maintenance
The principle operation and maintenance requirements associated with the
implementation of this technology include the need for regular cleaning of
the system and careful monitoring of the quality of the source water, as
the drip irrigation systems are very sensitive to the clogging of the
drippers. The systems also require a relatively high degree of skill to
design, install and operate, and are susceptible to theft, damage and
disruption by rodents that destroy the drip pipes and drippers.
Level of Involvement
The use of this technology requires skilled personnel. Because of the
relatively high capital cost of the piping systems necessary to implement
this technology, the initial funding for the project may require some
level of government involvement. Regular operation and maintenance of the
system is the responsibility of the individual operator.
Costs
The capital costs involved in the establishment of a drip irrigation
system are high compared to the costs of establishing conventional
irrigation systems. However, the labour requirements and operational costs
are low. The net result is that the benefit-cost ratio for DIS is very
favourable compared to conventional systems since the payback period for
investment very short. In the case of the orchard crops in Maharashtra,
the cost of DIS ranged from $450/ha to $1 150/ha in 1990. Elsewhere, the
cost of using drip irrigation systems for sugarcane irrigation averaged
$715/ha, for banana irrigation $1 150/ha, and for cotcrus-fruit irrigation
$575/ha, with the payback periods ranging from 2 months for banana crops,
12 months for cotcrus-fruit crops, and 18 months for surgarcane crops.
Comparative benefit-cost ratios for various crops ranged from 1.64 for
groundnuts (peanuts), to 4.84 for pomegranates, to 5.15 for tomatoes, to
8.58 for grapes, to 15.0 for mosambi. These ratios compare to benefit-cost
ratios of 1.80, 2.20, 3.96, 6.38, and 9.81, respectively, using
conventional irrigation systems.
Effectiveness of the Technology
In almost all of the cases reported, excepting the Jobner case, there
was an improvement in crop yields and savings in water use of between 18%
and 40%. Consequently, there was a substantial improvement in the water
use efficiency that ranged up to three times that of water use
efficiencies achieved using conventional surface irrigation methods, even
with the use of poor quality irrigation water. Because of the directed
delivery of irrigation water, it is possible to utilize poor quality
irrigation water using the drip irrigation system. The performance of this
technology is summarized in Tables 40 and 41. The data presented in Table
40 are based upon water savings and increased yields achieved in
Maharashtra State using drip irrigation systems. In addition to the
improved yields and water savings, for crops such as sugarcane there is a
savings in labour costs that equals the savings in water.
Advantages
The advantages of drip irrigation systems include an high efficiency of
water use and greater crop yields compared to other irrigation methods. In
addition, crops irrigated using drip irrigation systems generally require
less tillage and are of better quality. DIS also contribute to improved
plant protection and reduced occurrences of plant diseases and greater
efficiencies in the use of fertilizers, because water containing the
agrochemicals is applied directly to the plant roots in the quantities
necessary for optimal plant production. For a similar reason, DIS can also
make use of lower quality water, and results in no return flows, tail
water losses or increased soil erosion. Because water is applied in
optimal quantities, plants generally have a shorter growing season and
produce fruit earlier, with less weed growth and pest damage than
conventionally irrigated crops. The lower labour requirements result in
relatively low operational costs, with savings in labour of up to 90% of
the costs associated with conventional systems, in part, because
mechanical operations can be carried out simultaneously with the
application of irrigation water. DIS can be used in hilly terrain and on
lands with problem soils, and results in improved infiltration in soils
with low conductivity. Drip irrigation systems are low pressure systems,
which can be adapted for use in greenhouses, and with automated control
systems.
Disadvantages
Drip irrigations systems have a sensitivity to the clogging of the
drippers, which may require pretreatment of turbid source waters, and, if
not properly installed, can cause moisture distribution problems. The
systems are also susceptible to rodent damage. The systems have an high
cost compared to conventional irrigation methods, and require higher
levels of skill for design, installation, and operation, which make them
liable to damage or theft.
TABLE 47. Water Savings and Increased Yields Achieved
Using Drip Irrigation.
| Crop |
Water used by drip irrigation systems (mm/ha) |
Water used by conventional irrigation systems (mm/ha) |
% Saving of water |
Yield using drip irrigation systems (q/ha) |
Yield using conventional irrigation systems (q/ha) |
% increase in yield |
| Sugarcane |
-- |
-- |
50 |
100 000 tonnes |
-- |
35 |
| Bananas |
-- |
-- |
50 |
29 000 tonnes |
-- |
50 |
Cotcrus- Fruit |
-- |
-- |
50 |
80% harvest |
10% harvest |
50 |
| Grapes |
278 |
532 |
65-70 |
325 tonnes |
264 tonnes |
30 |
Pome- granates (plants spaced at
12-foot intervals) |
785 |
1 440 |
50-55 |
109 000 |
75 000 |
30 |
| Guavas |
-- |
-- |
55-60 |
-- |
-- |
25 |
| Caster Apples |
-- |
-- |
50-55 |
-- |
-- |
20 |
| Mosambi |
640 |
1 660 |
60 |
150 000 |
100 000 |
50 |
| Groundnuts (Peanuts) |
580 |
900 |
35 |
3 200 |
2 675 |
20 |
| Tomatoes |
222 |
324 |
30 |
48 000 |
32 000 |
50 |
TABLE 48. Effect of Irrigation Method on Crop Yield
and Water Savings.
Further Development of the Technology
This is a proven technology suitable for use with high value crops.
Several crops which can be irrigated using drip irrigation systems include
sugarcane, groundnuts or peanuts, coconuts, cotton, coffee, grapes,
potatoes, and all fruit crops, spaced vegetable crops, and flowers.
Information Sources
R.S. Saksena, Consultant Planning Commission and Chief
Engineer (MI, Retd.), Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India,
New Delhi.
|
 |
|