Newsletter and Technical Publications
<International Source Book On Environmentally Sound Technologies
for Wastewater and Stormwater Management>
2.9 Financing (Topic i)
The cost of construction and operation of sewerage schemes and treatment
plants in the West Asia region appears to be very high. However, there is a wide
variation in the cost among countries according to the quality of sewer lines
and degree of treatment level. It varies from about 1.0USD/m3 for
countries which use ordinary concrete pipelines and Wastewater Stabilisation
Ponds (WSP) to about 4-6USD/m3 in countries that use good quality
sewer lines and advanced treatment processes including tertiary treatments. The
cost of treatment varies according to capacity and method, for example in
Jordan, the cost of treating a unit volume of water using WSP is about 0.02USD/m3
compared to 0.23 USD/m3 where aerated lagoons are used.
In most of the West Asia countries, the provision of wastewater collection
and treatment is the responsibilities of the governments or municipalities,
which are funded also by the governments. Except in oil rich countries, priority
for investment has been given to providing people with drinking water supply and
little attention has been given to building collection and treatment facilities
or to improving the existing schemes until recently. Therefore, existing systems
are overloaded. The oil producing countries have invested above that required
(planning for the future) while for other countries like Jordan, Iraq, Egypt,
and Lebanon the investment level is under what is required (50%). The
investments of Yemen and Iran in this sector are around 30%.
The government of Oman is encouraging the participation of the private sector
in construction and operation of sewerage schemes. In their 1995 strategy, all
new housing complexes, hotels, universities, and hospitals are required to add
to their infrastructure the provision of construction of collection and
treatment system. The operation, maintenance, disposal and reuse are also the
responsibilities of the private sector subject to government approval and
monitoring
External sources of finance played a major part in investment in wastewater
projects for Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. The main sources of finance
come as grants from donor countries or loans from lending agencies like the
World Bank, European Investment Bank, Islamic Development Bank and the Arab
Funds. Oil producing countries rely on their internal funding. Furthermore,
their governments provide operation and maintenance costs for wastewater collection
and treatment schemes. Very little information on finance is available for Iraq
and Iran. As for the new Palestinian Authority, the whole infrastructure of
wastewater has to be built with financial support from donors' countries and
international agencies mainly as grants or soft loans.
In Jordan, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, the West Bank and Egypt, upgrading existing
facilities and construction of new facilities will require major investments in
the next ten years and beyond. Furthermore, the operation and maintenance of the
conveyance system and treatment plants will necessitate the allocation of
adequate annual budget to guarantee a safe and reliable level of collection and
treatment. Financing needs for wastewater projects are competing with other
infrastructure projects.
In all countries, tariffs were less than actual cost. For example, in Jordan
the collected fees for collection and treatment are about 0.5USD/m3 plus
subscription and taxes compared to the actual cost of 2.0USD/m3.
In most countries, projects have been operated by public authorities (water
sanitation authority) as in Jordan, Egypt, and Syria, or have been contracted
for operation by private companies as in some oil producing countries. In recent
years, many countries have launched substantial privatization programs and
projects in various sectors of their economy. This trend, which is encouraged by
the World Bank and other lending agencies, is expected to increase in the
future, leading to more private participation of water supply and wastewater
projects. There are many international water utility operators and investors
seeking such opportunities. In this respect the Water Authority of Jordan has
contracted Lyonnaise des Eaux (a French operator) to operate and manage the
water supply system to Greater Amman.
There are four main models for private sector participating, namely; (1) Management
or Service Contract model, (2) Affermage or Lease model, (3) Concession model,
(4) Build, Operate and Transfer model.
Although there are many benefits which would be gained through privatization
such as improved efficiency and better services, the social implications of
such a trend have yet to be evaluated. The use of public agencies create a lot
of job opportunities. What would happen if these agencies turned into private
companies? Whether they would employ less people is a community related question
being asked in the region.
|