Newsletter and Technical Publications
<International Source Book On Environmentally Sound Technologies
for Wastewater and Stormwater Management>
Channelisation of urban streams; recipients of solid and
liquid wastes
and stormwater; problems with clogging and flooding

Sewers connected to channelised streams

Uncontrolled urbanisation in the upper parts of streams;
covering of urban streams; building of separate sewer for wastewater

Figure 1.3: Sewerage system to convey wastewater and stormwater away from
communities
When the amount of wastes disposed to the environment increases
with the increase in settlement population, the capacity of the receiving environment
to assimilate the wastes is exceeded and degradation of the environment takes
place (Figure 1.1). Communities have responded in different ways to the public
health problem and environmental degradation that are created. Even though there
have been numerous ways in which the problem has been addressed, we may generalise
these in terms of stages depicted in Figures 1.3 - 1.5.
Because of the importance of dealing with health problems caused by wastewater
within the community, wastewater is transported away from the community. This is
done by improving drainage, while still conveying both wastewater and stormwater
through the same drains. Measures to reduce the incidence of flooding are
usually applied, by for example, deepening drainage channels, preventing solid
wastes from being dumped into drains, and covering of the drains represents the
first attempt to provide a sewerage system (Figure 1.3). In this way wastewater
and the inherent human pathogens in it are removed from the community as a
source of public health threat.
Environmental degradation of the receiving water still
continues. If the wastewater is disposed to a river the water will affect people
using it for bathing and washing, and downstream communities may withdraw the
water for drinking purposes. The amenity value of the river for recreational
purposes, for fishing, agriculture and industry is devalued. The classification
of rivers is a good illustration of how the quality of a river is determined by
its pollution load (Table 1.1).
Table 1.1: River pollution classification
| Class |
Description |
DO. & BOD* |
Characteristics |
| Class I |
Unpolluted or recovered from pollution |
BOD < 3 mg/L |
No toxic or suspended discharges which affect the river |
| Class II |
Doubtful quality and needing improvement |
BOD > 3 mg/L, toxic and reduced DO in dry flow times |
BToxic and suspended discharges occur but have no major
effect on biota |
| Class III |
Poor quality, improvement is a matter of some urgency |
DO < 50% for considerable periods |
River changed in character, suspected of being actively
toxic. Subject to serious complaint |
| Class IV |
Grossly polluted rivers |
BOD > 12 mg/L, completely deoxygenated |
Incapable of supporting fish life, grossly offensive |
*DO = dissolved oxygen; BOD = biochemical oxygen demand
(based on National Water Council (UK) classification, 1970) |
|