Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Proceedings of the International Symposium on Efficient Water Use in Urban
Areas
- Innovative Ways of Finding Water for Cities ->
MONITORING AND MANAGING UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER
Richard G. Sykes, Andrew K. Enos and Ronald L.
Bianchetti East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, California
USA
INTRODUCTION
The East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) supplies water to
approximately 1.3 million people in 35 cities and communities on the
eastern side of San Francisco Bay in California. Over 90 percent of EBMUDs
water supply comes from the Sierra Nevada Mountains via three 140-km
(90-mile) long aqueducts. The remaining water supply is from watersheds
and reservoirs in the local East Bay Hills.
Average water demand is approximately 760 million liters per day (ML/d)
(200 million gallons per day or MGD). This water is produced by six water
treatment plants. Two plants are operated year round, three plants are
operated seasonally from 8 to 10 months per year, and the remaining plant
is a standby facility. EBMUDs water distribution system includes
approximately 6,400 km (4000 miles) of pipeline, 126 pumping plants and
165 treated water reservoirs.
EBMUD has conducted a program to monitor and manage unaccounted for
water. This program is an integral part of the water system operation and
maintenance and is critical to ensure efficient management of our limited
water supply. Benefits of managing and minimizing unaccounted-for water
include:
- Reduces demand on scarce water supplies and minimizes the need to
develop additional supply
- Reduces water and revenue losses
- Reduces pumping and treatment costs
- Increased knowledge of the distribution system
- Reduction of property damage through improved maintenance
DEFINITION OF UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER
There is no universally applied or accepted definition of
unaccounted-for water (1,2). In general, unaccounted-for water is the
difference between the water supplied to a distribution system and the
water that leaves the system through its intended use. Some have defined
unaccounted-for water as water supplied to a system less all metered water
leaving the system. Other utilities use a broader definition whereby
unaccounted for is all water that cannot be accounted for through
measurement or estimation (3). The value or percentage of unaccounted-for
water is an excellent overall indicator of the operating efficiency of a
water system.
EBMUD defines unaccounted-for water as total water plant production
provided to the distribution system minus the sum of all metered flow from
the system and all unmetered authorized uses. In this definition,
unaccounted-for water includes water loss from all underground
distribution system piping facilities, illegal connections or theft, and
inaccurate metering.
Unaccounted-for water is very difficult to calculate if a water system
is not metered. If the system is partially metered, then estimates can be
made to account for water leaving the system that is legitimately being
used in useful ways (e.g. fire fighting, hydrant and water main flushing,
water quality, etc.). It is important that water utilities recognize and
estimate these uses so that they can accurately determine the magnitude of
losses such as leakage, illegal connections or theft, and inaccurate
metering. EBMUDs system is metered for nearly all uses with the
exception of fire hydrants. Most systems in the United States meter all
residential, commercial and industrial uses.
Unaccounted-for Water Goal
A number of organizations have specified goals for utilities to use in
managing unaccounted-for water. The California Urban Water Conservation
Council, of which EBMUD is a member, identifies a 10 percent benchmark for
unaccounted-for water (4). If metered water sales plus other
verifiable uses are less than 90
percent of water supplied to a distribution system, then steps should be
taken by the utility to identify and reduce losses. In 1996, the AWWA Leak
Detection and Accountability Committee recommended 10 percent as a
benchmark for unaccounted-for water (5). EBMUD water loss reduction
programs aim to keep unaccounted-for water at 10 percent or less.
PROGRAMS FOR CONTROLLING WATER LOSS
EBMUD controls water loss using a variety of efforts. The first is to
identify the magnitude and source of that loss. The second is to review
accuracy of meters used to measure system inflow and outflow. The third is
to develop an appropriate leak detection program. The fourth is to have a
reasonable program to respond to identified leaks. The final step is to
have a pipe replacement program that helps ensure a tight distribution
system. Each of these efforts is described below in general terms that
might be applicable to all water systems. Examples of EBMUD experiences
are provided for each.
The First Step is Identifying Water Loss
Accounting for all water use is the first step in developing a program
for water loss. Determing water loss quantity requires reliable estimates
of water production and use. A checklist and method for determining
unaccounted-for water is provided in Water Conservation Plan
Guidelines published by the Unites States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) in August 1998. (This information is available on the World
Wide Web at http://www.epa.gov/OWM/genwave.htm#guideline.)
The American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AWWARF)
includes a water audit procedure somewhat similar to what EBMUD uses. The
water audit is an accounting of all water into and out of a distribution
system to determine the efficiency of the system and to identify the
location and magnitude of water losses (1). There are four basic steps for
a water audit:
- Identify and quantify each source of water
- Identify, quantify and verify authorized metered water uses
- Identify and estimate unmetered water uses
- Identify and estimate water loss
The water audit information is the cornerstone of determining priorities
for a program to control leakage and water loss.
EBMUDs process for estimating water loss involves measurement of
all input into the distribution system and subtraction of the following
items:
- All metered water use from revenue and non-revenue meters
(non-revenue meters include fire services, some public facilities, and
EBMUD facilities)
- All metered water use from portable hydrant meters supplied to
contractors, cities and others for construction and municipal uses
- Estimates of water system flushing and cleaning
- Estimates of water loss from main breaks
- Estimates of water use from fire fighting and fire hydrant testing
- Estimates of leakage from distribution reservoirs
The remaining unaccounted-for water includes leakage from pipelines and
underground appurtenances, meter inaccuracy, illegal connections and
theft. From 1993 through 1997, EBMUDs annual rate for this water
loss ranged from 8 to 10 percent. In 1998, the figure was 12 percent. For
EBMUD, a 12 percent water loss rate equates to about 91 ML/d (24 MGD).
Because of this recent increase, EBMUD initiated a review of its water
accounting procedure. This review is underway and results are not yet
available. Meter Accuracy and Testing
Metered water sales are the base of revenue for EBMUD and most other
water suppliers. Meter accuracy is therefore of great importance to ensure
accurate billing. It is also important to water conservation efforts and
necessary for accurately determining unaccounted-for water. AWWARF has
indicated that meter accuracy declines over time, with under-registration
being typical. The AWWARF also notes that the failure rate for small
meters may be as high as 3 percent. Any water utility that wishes to
measure and reduce unaccounted for water must ensure reasonable meter
accuracy (1).
EBMUDs water system contains approximately 375,000 metered
connections. Ninety percent of these are for residential customers. EBMUD
maintains two programs to ensure meter accuracy. One program focuses on
small meters. Small meters are defined as those with a diameter less than
76 mm (3 inches). These small meters represent about 80 percent of the
revenue billed annually. Accuracy of these devices is determined by
performing periodic calibration checks on a small subset of worst
case units. For example, EBMUD just recently completed a check on
200 of its oldest small residential meters (16mm or 5/8 inch). This check
indicated that 95 percent the units were reading within the specified
accuracy of the device (typically registering 98 percent to 102 percent of
actual flow). Based on these periodic checks, EBMUD assumes reasonable
accuracy (within manufacturers limits) of its small meters. Currently, the
replacement program for small meters is as-needed based on problems
identified by meter readers or customers.
A more rigorous testing program is conducted for large meters which
EBMUD defines as those with a diameter of 76 mm (3 inches) or greater.
EBMUD has about 2,500 meters in this size range and they represent about
20 percent of revenue billed annually. Each of these devices is checked
for accuracy at least once every 2 years. If accuracy is not within
specified standards for the meter type and size, then the unit is repaired
or replaced as appropriate.
All water meters are read monthly or bi-monthly by trained staff.
Besides reading meters, these employees detect significant changes in
metered water use and identify physical or accuracy problems. The meter
readers issue repair orders for about 11 percent (about 41,000 units) of
all meters annually. Thus, meter readers are an important part of ensuring
meter accuracy, not to mention their role in identifying leaks in the
vicinity of the meter.
Another step in ensuring meter accuracy is a review by staff who prepare
customer water bills. At EBMUD, these employees are trained to identify
unusual changes in water use patterns. As a result, they also issue meter
repair orders based on possible accuracy problems. Repair/inspection
orders of this type average about 6,000 annually.
|