|
|
 |
Newsletter and Technical Publications
Freshwater Management Series No. 5
Guidelines for the Integrated Management of
the Watershed
- Phytotechnology and Ecohydrology -
8. THE REGULATION AND CONTROL OF HYDROLOGIC
AND BIOTIC PROCESSESS WITHIN
RESERVOIRS FOR WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
A. Introduction
From the ecohydrological point of view, a large dam
within a river basin can be considered as the technical system modifying three
of the major components of river basin integrity; namely:
- river continuum processes, by changing the pattern of mineral, organic
matter, and nutrient spiralling downstream;
- floods pulses, by interrupting the passage of flood peaks downstream
of the dam,
thereby modifying environmental maintenance processes such as ecological
succession, biodiversity, biological productivity of terrestrial and aquatic
ecosystems, and sediment loads; and,
- retention rates, by trapping
minerals, organic matter, and nutrients, increasing the vulnerability of
reservoir ecosystems by accumulating nutrients and pollutants from large river
basins, thereby modifying nutrients and energy dynamics within the impounded
stretch of river.
In the upper sections of free flowing rivers, nutrients are transfer
downstream in a trophic spiral (Webster 1979, Newbold et al. 1981).
The processes that create this trophic spiral, and
govern its length and breadth, are dependent on allochthonous inputs,
hydrology, and energy. In the floodplains of larger rivers, the periodic pulse
of the hydrological cycle depends on the connectivity of the river channel and
the floodplain, and, especially, of the ecosystems situated along the river
floodplain that are highly dependent upon seasonal fluxes of dissolved organic
matter and nutrients (Agostinho and Zalewski 1995).
Hypothetical
model to predict the effects of large dams on river basin environments
As a consequence of recent progress in understanding
the functioning of ecosystems, the inclusion of ecological theories in the
resolution of environmental dilemmas is now a practicable alternative, and one
that is being increasingly applied worldwide
Rivers,
throughout the different regions of the globe, are one of the most diverse and
dynamic components of the ecosystem. Ward and Stanford (1983), in the "intermediate disturbance
hypothesis" noted the role of disturbances of
varying intensities in shaping riverine biotic communities. This hypothesis has
the potential to be used as a tool for predicting the positive or negative
effects of large dams on biodiversity and bioproductivity within the basin
landscape. According to this hypothesis, the highest productivity and
biodiversity should appear within ecosystems where disturbances (hydraulic
variability) occur at an intermediate level. Because reservoirs act to
stabilise flooding patterns and reduce the downstream transport of organic
matter, nutrients, and pollutants, dams in hydrologically variable
environments, such as the Syrian semi-desert, will limit the occurrence of
catastrophic floods and by retaining water and gradually releasing it. This
gradual discharge should enhance instream and river valley biological
productivity and downstream diversity (Figure 8.1). In contrast, dams situated
within tropical floodplain systems, inundating areas of low slope, not only
fail to generate significant amounts of electric energy, but, instead, by
flooding large areas covered with high levels of plant biomass, create serious
problems by enhancing methane emissions and changing the character of these
highly diverse areas.
|
 |
| Fig. 8.1. The link between
ecological theory (intermediate disturbance concept) and the optimisation of
dam usage according to ecohydrological principles (lager
image) |
Ecohydrology
as a tool for the restoration of eutrophic reservoirs
Freshwater
management strategies for dams have been focused, up to now, on issues such as
flood protection, drought relief, and energy generation. However, degraded
water quality in reservoirs as a consequence of catchment development is an
emerging problem. The problem is linked to increasing nutrient loads to these
lakes from their watersheds, and exacerbated by nutrient retention within the
reservoir and subsequent recirculation by the biota. The worst of these impacts
is toxic cyanobacterial blooms. Their carcinogenic hepatotoxins are one of the
most dangerous substances generated by algae in eutrophic reservoirs, according
to Cood (2000).
Notwithstanding,
every successful strategy should possess a second important component, that of
amplifying opportunities for sustainable use and economic development (see
Figure 1.3). This element of environmental management has usually been
neglected. Thus, one of the important emerging opportunities in environmental
management is establishing a resistance and resilience to stress among
freshwater ecosystems by utilising natural ecosystem-level processes. These
processes are dependent upon hydrological processes at the basin scale.
Understanding this relationship begins with the integration of three dynamic
components: the catchment, the water, and the biota. Collectively, these
components form a "Platonian superorganism" Ecohydrology, which has been
defined as the science of integrating hydrological processes with biological
systems over varied spatial and temporal scales, can be used to create an
holistic model of river systems at the basin scale. This level of integration,
analogous to the "Platonian superorganism" implies management targets that
include the maintenance of sustainability, as measured by biodiversity, water
quality, and water quantity.
The key to implementing this concept of conservation and restoration of freshwater
ecosystems is ecosystem biotechnologies, which are focused on the conversion
and control of nutrient circulation at the ecosystem and landscape levels. The
regulation of biological, biogeochemical, and hydrological processes are
essential elements in the retention, transformation, self-purification,
attenuation, elimination, sedimentation, dislocation, biofiltration, and
recirculation of nutrients and energy (Figure 1.10).
The ecohydrological approach has been recently applied in a programme of
restoration of an eutrophic lowland reservoir, which, despite toxic
cyanobacterial blooms, has been supplying drinking water for a population of
about 1 million people (Zalewski 1999). The annual phosphorus load, mostly from
non-point source pollution, exceeds 8 g m-2 year-1. To
achieve a mesotrophic state, with a transparency of 2.5 m, and to eliminate
toxic algal blooms, it has been determined that the phosphorus load should be
reduced to less than 1 g m-2 year-1.
Such a reduction could be achieved by integrating classical technical methods
of nutrient management with landscape ecology and recent advances in biogeochemistry
and phytotechnology at the basin scale.
Classical restoration measures consisted of upgrading
the sewage treatment plants in the catchment, transferring the purified sewage
effluent from the upstream catchment to a discharge point below the reservoir,
and dredging to minimise internal phosphorus loading from contaminated
sediments. In addition, phytotechnological methods were applied, including the
restoration of ecotones, the regulation of flow regimes to modify the pattern
of nutrient supply and loading into reservoir, the restoration of the river
channel to enhance self-purification and nutrient retention, and the conversion
of the upper part of reservoir into wetland to enhance sedimentation and
nutrient trapping. A third step was the control of biotic processes, such as
enhancing zooplankton populations, regulating water levels in the reservoir to
promote reproduction of predatory fishes, enhancing filtration by molluscs, and
creating artificial reed beds in the littoral zone to stabilise and regulate
the land and water biotic interactions.
These processes were
quantitatively evaluated to document their effectiveness in controlling
eutrophication, and the results were integrated into an holistic model for lake
restoration. This model was utilised in a programme of adaptive management
(Holling et al. 1994), which was
implemented in consideration of the scale of the processes, and the potential
antagonistic and synergistic effects between the steps enumerated above. In
this programme, ecohydrology provided the scientific core, by utilising
ecosystem properties in the management of freshwater the ecosystem for human
use and mitigation of human impacts (Zalewski 2000). This implementation
programme was based upon three criteria. It had to be environmentally sound,
economically feasible, and socially acceptable.
|
 |
|