|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
Freshwater Management Series No. 5
Guidelines for the Integrated Management of
the Watershed
- Phytotechnology and Ecohydrology -
G. Denitrification and aromatic compound removal from freshwater ecosystems
Many freshwater reservoirs receive nitrogen compounds transported in
the systems as a consequence of different forms of human activity. These
activities include: runoff from agriculture areas, fish culture ponds, and atmospheric
fallout as well as point source inputs of pollutants from community and
industrial wastewater discharges. Autochthonous microflora remove nitrogen
through the denitrification process, and are one of the biological methods that
can be used to remove nitrogen compounds from, primarily, eutrophic ecosystems.
Denitrifying bacteria can be found naturally in sediments, surface waters,
soils, and municipal and industrial wastes. Their numbers in freshwater and
sediments rapidly increase with the diminishing redox potentials and increased
availability of oxygenated nitrogen compounds. Nitrate denitrifying bacteria
can follow one of the three metabolic pathways resulting in the formation of
gaseous nitrogen. Two of these pathways do not result in the accumulation of
nitrite, while one pathway results in a transient accumulation of toxic nitrite
(Błaszczyk 1999). Maximal denitrification rates occur most often at the end of
spring or during summer, and appear to vary mainly with temperature.
Denitrification is especially evident in reservoirs where a significant portion
of the nutrient supply comes from mineralisation of organic matter within the
sediments.
Methods
Denitrification rates in lake bottom sediments are difficult to
measure because they are the net result of several reactions. Nitrification,
denitrification, N-fixation, and nitrate reduction to ammonia occur
simultaneously in an aquatic ecosystem. Some methods for measuring
denitrification rates in sediments include:
- The acetylene inhibition technique is
a standard addition method as acetylene inhibits the nitrification process
(Seitzinger et al. 1993).
- The 15N tracer method (Nielsen 1992, Seitzinger et
al. 1993).
- The N2 flux method,
requiring a long period of pre-incubation of the sediment (Seitzinger 1987).
- The in situ chamber method in which the denitrification rate
is calculated from
the total N2 flux out of the sediment, measured directly by gas
chromatography (Tomaszek 2000).
- The occurrence of denitrifying bacteria, determined
by means of the most probable number and plate counting methods,
requiring the identification of denitrifying bacteria according to API 20NE
system (Biomerieux) (Błaszczyk 1997).
Empirical relationships
There are both temporal and spatial variations in
the denitrification process (Bednarek et
al. 2002). The principal relationships include:
- Temporal variations
in the denitrification rate determined by temperature, resulting in a linear
increase in denitrification within the temperature range of 5 to 35ºC.
- Variations
in the denitrification rate consequent to the occurrence of anaerobic or nearly
anaerobic conditions.
- pH-related
variations in denitrification rates between values of 7.0 and 8.2.
- Variations
in denitrification rate due to redox potentials of less than + 100 mV.
- Rate
variations as a result of the availability of oxygenated nitrogen compounds.
- A positive
correlation [r = 0,86; p<0,05] between the organic matter content of the
sediments and denitrification rate, and between sediment structure (as
described by the quantity of organic carbon) [r = 0,84;p<0,05] and
denitrification (Figure 7.8).

Fig. 7.8. The positive correlation between denitrification
rate and organic carbon content of the sediments
The denitrification process is the most efficient in
inundated areas and in constructed wetlands. These areas, therefore, provide
the sites for processes that significantly reduce the nitrogen content of
waters entering reservoirs and freshwater systems.
|