space
About UNEP
space
space
United Nations Environment Programme
Division of Technology, Industry and Economics
top image
space
space space space
space
space
Newsletter and Technical Publications
Freshwater Management Series No. 5

Guidelines for the Integrated Management of the Watershed
- Phytotechnology and Ecohydrology -


D. Optimisation of stream bank vegetation cover -  intermediate complexity hypothesis

The natural characteristics and ecological health of streams are linked to the landscape by the biotic and physicochemical properties of the riparian zone. The functions of riparian vegetation with respect to aquatic ecosystems is summarised in Table 6.2.

Table 6.2. The functions of riparian vegetation in aquatic ecosystems (adapted from Swanson et al. 1982)
Sites Components Functions
Aboveground/above channel Canopy and stems
  • shade controls in-stream temperature and primary production
  • source of large and fine plant detritus
  • wildlife habitat
In channel Large debris derived from riparian vegetation
  • controls routing of water and sediment
  • shapes habitat: pools, riffles, runs, and cover
Streambanks Roots
  • increases bank stability
  • creates overhanging banks, and cover
  • takes up nutrients from ground and stream water
Floodplain Stems and low-lying canopy
  • retards movement of sediment, water and floated organic debris during floods

Riparian vegetation largely determines the input of solar energy to a river by directly influencing the primary productivity of algae and macrophytes, and by indirectly influencing the productivity of higher trophic levels like invertebrates and fish. According to the intermediate complexity hypothesis (Zalewski et al. 1994), the optimal energy pathways in river channels are achieved at an intermediate level of complexity of riparian vegetation. This hypothesis was verified by field studies in small river systems.

In the case of primary production, the opening of dense canopies over stream habitats may create better conditions for cyanophyte communities while disadvantaging diatom communities. This shift in algal populations can influence water quality. Both cyanophytes and diatoms possess an high affinity for phosphorus at concentrations below 500 g P-PO4 l-1 (Figure 6.5), but, at low phosphorus concentrations (below 200 g l-1), cyanophytes have a three times higher ability to assimilate phosphorus (maximum uptake rate of about 770 g P-O4 g-1 dry mass (d.m.) day-1) than the diatoms (maximum uptake rate of about 302 g P-O4 g-1 d.m. day-1). This, in turn, suggests that cyanophytes have an higher capacity to buffer the stream from pollutants than do the diatoms community. This results in an higher absorption capacity for the stream ecosystem.

Fig. 6.5. Changes in absorption capacity of an ecosystem due to the modification of energy in streams by riparian ecotone control (after Bednarek and Zalewski 2001, changed)

The level of complexity in riparian vegetation is also important for fish community biomass and diversity. It was found that, for small-sized rivers, the optimal complexity of riparian vegetation for maintaining high fish biomass and diversity is when the amount of light reaching the stream channel is between 300 to 700 Ecm-2 s-1 (Łapińska 1996, Zalewski et al. 2001). Fish biomass and diversity in such habitats may be up to three times higher than in habitats with higher or lower levels of light input (Figure 6.6).

A proposed design for the rehabilitation of an in-stream habitat for fish by restoring and properly maintaining riparian ecotones is summarised in Table 6.3.

The proper restoration and management of streams for fishery enhancement purposes should include the conservation or reconstruction of the natural channel morphology and its riparian zone structure. By restoring the pool-riffle-run sequences, together with the optimal degree of canopy cover by the riparian vegetation, the habitat carrying capacity of the stream for biota can be maintained, and the river self-purification ratio could be accelerated (Figure 6.7).

 

      Table of Contents

          

  • Brochure
  • IETC Brochure


  • International Year of Forests
  • International Year of Forests


  • World Environment Day
  • ??????


  • UNEP Campaign
  • UNite to Combat Climate Change