|

- Background -
The application of the concept of sustainable development to
cities is similar to its application to the global system as a whole. It is
clear that cities have sources and sinks, and that people living in them utilize
resources and generate pollution, just as in the case of the global system. The
main difference between cities and the global system is that the former are not
fully closed systems. That is, unlike the global system, cities can import
resources and export pollutants. However, these importing and exporting
activities have limits. For example, the trucking of garbage to landfills
outside of a city becomes increasingly costly, the farther from the city the
landfills are located and the importation of fresh water to replenish a city's
depleted aquifers becomes increasingly costly, the greater the distance the
water must be piped. Thus, as with all real social systems, cities have limited
carrying capacities. If the carrying capacity of a city is eroded, it becomes
increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to create a sustainable environment.
As in the case of the global system as a whole, sustainable cities must not use
resources faster than they can be replenished or substituted for, nor generate
pollution faster than it can be naturally assimilated. Further, the
infrastructure (carrying capacity) of a sustainable city must be able to support
the current needs of its population - particularly its poorest citizens. If
these criteria are followed, the ability of future generations to meet their
needs will not be compromised.
The world’s cities take up just two percent of the Earth’s
surface, yet account for roughly 78 percent of the carbon emissions from human
activities, 76 percent of industrial wood use, and 60 percent of the water
tapped for use by people.
These figures suggest that the struggle to achieve an
environmentally sustainable economy will be won or lost in the world’s urban
areas. Urban systems are undermining the planet’s health and failing to
provide decent living conditions for millions of people.
London, for example, now requires roughly 58 times its land area
just to supply its residents with food and timber. Meeting the needs of everyone
in the world in the same way that the needs of Londoners are met would require
at least three more Earths.
Today, at least 600 million city dwellers in the developing
world do not have adequate shelter and 1.1 billion choke on unhealthy air.
Polluted air in 36 Indian cities killed some 52,000 people in 1995, a 28 percent
increase from the early 1990s. China reported at least 3 million deaths from
toxic urban air between 1994 and 1996.
Rapid urbanization in the twentieth century has magnified the
environmental impact of cities. In 1900, only 160 million people, one tenth of
the world’s population, were urbanites. By 2006, in contrast, half the world
(3.2 billion people) will live in urban areas—a 20-fold increase in numbers.
Because of inadequate systems and poor planning, cities are disproportionately
driving global warming, deforestation, and increasing water scarcity. Changes in
six areas are needed to make cities better for people and the planet:
-
Water
-
Waste
-
Food
-
Energy
-
Transportation and
-
Land-use
One of the guiding principles will be to reform urban systems so
that they mimic the metabolism of nature. Rather than devouring water, food,
energy, and processed goods, and then belching out the remains as pollutants,
the city could align its consumption with realistic needs, produce more of its
own food and energy, and put much more of its waste to use. Some Examples where
cities are proving to be more nimble than nations at using planning and fiscal
reform to put these ideas into action:
There is an increasing belief that the original approach to
environmental impacts and their mitigation, characterized by centralized
"command-and-control" regulation targeted at emissions and existing
waste sites, is far too limited to support the achievement of a sustainable
cities.
As Cities move into the 21st Century the need to reduce
environmental impacts, control costs, risks and liabilities are of paramount
importance. Society is faced with environmental and economic issues and problems
that will have profound effects upon survival, quality of life and Sustainable
Development.
To answer these problems and provide solutions a new, integrated
and holistic paradigm is required.
To this end the IETC "Cities as Sustainable
Ecosystems" (CASE) Thematic Programme:
-
is one of the foundation stones upon which the future will
be built.
-
deals with issues such as the interaction and relationship
within and between Cities, their impacts upon the environment and, in
particular, the opportunities for all types wastes to become useful inputs
-
embraces the interactions of all urban activity and the
environment and how these can be transformed into a positive and ethical
relationship.
This goal cannot be reached without developing a more
sophisticated coherent intellectual framework. This framework should support the
development of the urban management and planning theories, methodologies
required by the "new" urban decision and policy makers and technical
experts so that they can develop and implement environmentally preferable
processes, operations and technologies. Moreover, there is clearly a necessary
role for universities at all levels in supporting basic research in this area,
particularly in developing the field of ecology, and encouraging the development
and diffusion of the resulting knowledge and technologies.
|