Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Municipal Solid Waste Management>
Regional Overviews and Information Sources
Asia
2.2 Topic j: Public education
East Asia/Pacific
Ecology and the role of environmental management are becoming part of the
school curricula in Australia, Japan, and New Zealand. All the industrialized
countries have frequent campaigns to promote environmental awareness. The
"Clean Up Australia Day" has expanded to be the "Clean Up the
World" movement.
The subjects of ecology and environmental management are being introduced in
the school curricula in some developing countries, but there is not much
expertise available to instruct teachers, especially as regards waste
management.
Despite the lack of resources, campaigns are organized regularly to promote
environmental awareness and resource conservation through recycling/reuse of
waste materials. An attitudinal problem to be overcome is that "it's the
government's job to deal with garbage." When Malaysia launched a national
program for cleanliness, the Ministry of Housing and Local Government chose a
slogan that translated as "When the public is clean, the nation will be
healthy." Some people said they found this very puzzling the public did not
need to be clean as it was the government's responsibility to ensure
cleanliness.
Examples of public education in both the industrialized and the developing
countries include:
- Regular "Green and Clean" campaigns to promote environmental
awareness (e.g., the campaigns of Metro Manila Women Balikatan Movement and
Green Forum in Manila);
- Introduction of environmental education and ecology in the school
curricula; organization of teachers' workshops (Australia, New Zealand);
- Television cartoons (e.g., the Magic Eyes movement in Bangkok);
- In many Japanese cities, extensive outreach by solid waste departments
through school visits to explain MSWM problems and waste minimization,
recycling, and reuse. In Osaka, there are "anti-littering" leaders
and "no littering" forums; the first day of each month is
designated "beautification day," when there is a coordinated
clean-up effort.
- Promotion of green products, green labeling, and green manufacturing;
- Establishment of instruction centers which are responsible for publishing
newsletters and providing information to schools, businesses, the public,
and plant managers to enhance performance and create awareness (e.g., in
Osaka).
South and West Asia
There are two rather different conceptions of public understanding of MSWM.
The prevalent approach is the conventional "public education" one.
This assumes that citizens are largely ignorant about MSWM and lack motivation
to learn; that behavior will change as a result of educational exhortations; and
that what is required most is public compliance with rules established by the
authorities. The alternative is the community participation approach. In this
the role of the public is conceived differently: waste management is seen as
meeting citizens' needs so that citizens are entitled to transparency in
decision making; MSWM is not merely a service delivered by urban authorities but
a cooperative undertaking that requires the coordination of informal behaviors
and conventional MSWM; and there is an assumption that watchfulness on the part
of citizens is crucial to monitoring MSWM. Under this conception, citizens can
voluntarily perform some of the work, and people should assess the performance
of municipal staff and have the right to raise questions about decisions on, for
instance, the siting of dumps and transfer stations.
There is often misunderstanding between the proponents of these views, and
this may be observed in some Indian subcontinental cities where groups are
mobilizing residents for better solid waste services. But, more importantly,
there is room for constructive accommodation between the two approaches.
Recently, in Bangalore, India, a stakeholder environmental organization (Swabhimana)
has been created that includes representatives of both the city corporation and
the residents.
Public knowledge, and the willingness to devote time and energy to
cleanliness and waste reduction, vary along the full range of knowledge and
motivation, both within societies and across societies in this region. In the
countries with low levels of literacy, habits of frugality and
recovery/recycling are strong, public awareness of modern solid waste management
is very low, and there are many problems of collection and disposal. In the more
wasteful economies, there are higher expectations for waste services, but
insufficient attention to waste reduction and recycling. Understanding of the
dynamics and the costs of MSWM needs to be increased among the public and also
among government servants and politicians.
A constraint upon public education and community participation is that
strongly held attitudes, often grounded in religious beliefs, do not change
readily. In most of the societies in this region, waste handling is not a
culturally acceptable practice for most categories of the population: waste
collection work, and certain types of recycling, are done by designated groups
or disadvantaged people, who are stigmatized. Waste left in public areas may not
be perceived as a public health risk or even an eyesore. These are some of the
attitudes that will need to change if the societies are to have effective waste
management.
Anti-litter campaigns, a popular approach to public education, do not have
lasting effect unless they are part of a more comprehensive strategy. Simple
litter campaigns are, in effect, "end of the pipe" approaches, since
they do not address issues of waste generation and disposal.
Some country campaigns are arranged as annual cleanliness weeks or lectures
to schools. Information leaflets are also distributed before major festivals to
inform the public about special arrangements at those times. The most
outstanding example is during the Haj. The German-aided solid waste project in
Kathmandu included public education that was developed by social workers
familiar with the local cultures. Community education is a component of the
solid waste management program in Karachi, funded by the Asian Development Bank.
The campaigns run by the Water and Sewage Authority of Lahore, against solid
waste dumping in sewers and streams, would be beneficial for any city or town in
the region.
Most public awareness efforts are directed to children, since they are
responsive and easily accessible, and it is believed that they can influence
adult attitudes. In Karachi an NGO (Gul Bahoo) has devised school recycling
projects. In a few schools dry and wet waste is being separated and the
organization comes once a week to collect the waste in exchange for toys.
Since the late 1980s, Israel has greatly increased its efforts to support
public awareness and cooperation. The Maintenance of Cleanliness Law (1984)
allows members of the public to be appointed "cleanliness trustees,"
who attend training sessions. The Ministry of Environment organizes anti-litter
campaigns. The full gamut of techniques is used for public education: press
releases, television spots, distribution of stickers and posters, school
programs, and beach cleanups. Recently, the Ministry of Environment has begun
awarding environmental "green" labels to products, including ones that
facilitate recycling.
The success of the inter-city cleanliness and health competition in Indonesia
has prompted discussion of similar competitions in the Middle East. The
important issues in such competitions are the criteria used to judge whether a
city is "clean" and how good is the information presented on
compliance with the criteria.
In India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka in the past ten years, citizen groups have
been spearheading changes in public awareness of waste and recycling issues.
Organizations like Civic Exnora in India devote a considerable amount of time to
public presentations on litter problems and the potential for cooperation to
organize better waste collection in neighborhoods. Community groups are paying
more attention to source separation to enhance recycling and assist waste
pickers.
The corporate sector has begun to support awareness announcements, such as
brief television announcements featuring recycling enterprises and the work of
citizen groups. They also contribute to school campaigns, supporting recycling
drives and canteen composting.
International workshops, bilateral action research projects, and the work of
individual scholars and some entrepreneurs are beginning to fill the gaps in
public education programs. For instance, expertise and funds from the
Netherlands, the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, the
United Nations Centre for Human Settlements, and foreign advisors (from Canada,
the Netherlands, and Switzerland) have supported a small core of local experts
and concerned citizens in Bangalore since 1989. The Centre for Environmental
Education, the Mythri Foundation (Waste Wise project), and Swabhimana (a
citizens' movement; the term means "self-respect") are all active in
keeping waste issues before the public and in lobbying the city administration.
A point emphasized by a 1994 workshop on "linkages in solid waste
management" was that education has to reach politicians and bureaucrats, as
well as residents.
There is much scope for exchange of information and collaboration among city
departments and NGOs on the subject of community participation in and knowledge
about MSWM. While there are limitations to city- twinning arrangements, the
exchange of ideas among similar cities and towns is developing. CITYNET is
supporting such exchanges in Asia.
|