|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Planning and Management of Lakes and
Reservoirs: An Integrated Approach to Eutrophication>
CHAPTER 7. MANAGEMENT
7.4. Management of Reservoirs in Latin America
7.4.3. Ecotechnologies for Watershed/Reservoir Management
Basic principles
Three unifying principles to reservoir management are fundamental:
- Reservoirs have a filling phase that sets up the whole spectrum of
functioning of the system.
- Reservoirs have a dam with a structure, which sets up the boundary of
the upstream/downstream system.
- Reservoirs have an operational system that controls the ecological
conditions upstream/downstream.
The dynamics of reservoir construction and functioning take into account
the watershed as a unit. Thus the management of the watershed/reservoir
complex is the main objective. Ecotechnology is here defined as the use of
technological means for ecosystem management based on a profound knowledge
of principles of ecosystem functioning. This knowledge is then transferred
to management in such a way that costs of recovery and the whole process
of recovery and multiple uses are minimized. Thus, the use of theory for
sound environmental management directed towards long-term sustainability
is emphasized.
The principles to be taken into account to manage watershed/reservoirs
are as follows:
Ecosystem principles to be considered in watershed/reservoir management:
- Ecosystems conserve energy and matter
- Ecosystems store information
- Ecosystems are dissipative
- Ecosystems are open systems
- Ecosystems are contrained
- Ecosystems are differentiated
- Ecosystems are multiple feedback systems
- Ecosystems are capable of homeostasis
- Ecosystems have capacity to adapt and self-organize
The management procedures that effectively regulate the reservoir
functioning are based on the following measures:
- Control of pulses
- Control of succession
- Maintaining/restoring biodiversity
- Control of excess nutrients
- Control of eutrophication
- Taking into account the interaction upstream/downstream
Several methods were applied to reservoirs in Latin America, in an
effort to implement adequate technologies for management. These methods
were:
- Reforestation of the watershed with native species, as a means to
retain biodiversity
- River restoration - restoration of the tributaries with several low
cost techniques
- Wetland recovery and conservation in order to provide buffer systems
to the reservoirs
- Preinpoundment of tributaries in order to prevent loads of nutrients
and suspended material to the reservoirs
- Reintroduction of native species of fishes
- Maintenance of preserved areas as buffer systems in the watershed
(forest fragments)
- Lake shore management
- Control of retention time
- Removal and chemical isolation of sediment
- Reservoir mixing
- Biomanipulation
- Reduction of light penetration
- Regulation of algal blooms (by several techniques)
Example: São Paulo State Reservoir
São Paulo State has a hydropower-installed capacity of 10x105
MW. Several large dams were built up in the last 60 years to develop this
energy source. The remaining hydropower is 2,800 MW allowing for the
implementation of small hydroelectric plants.
Constructed originally for hydropower, these reservoirs are now an
important basis for regional development since their multiple uses are
increasing: for example the six reservoirs in Tiete River now encompass a
820 km of waterways. Multiple use of these reservoirs include, therefore,
hydropower, navigation, tourism, recreation, and biomass production
(fisheries and aquaculture).
These activities are all potential sources of eutrophication. A total
approximately 25 million people are living in the lower and upper Tietê
River. Untreated sewage, non-point sources of nitrogen and phosphorus, are
the main causes of rapid eutrophication. Toxicity from agriculture is
another source of contamination. The intensive land use activities has
originated a high level of deforestation and sediment transport into the
reservoirs accelerating aging, reducing primary production of
phytoplankton, and interfering with navigation and recreation. The
large-scale growth of water hyacinths, such as Eichhornia crassipes,
is one of the most important consequences of this rapid eutrophication and
general deterioration of water quality. The institutional developments to
implement a recovery of these systems are:
- Organizing a consortium of river basin committees of 40 towns and
villages along the Tietê River. This consortium will promote
surveillance actions, independent environmental audits, and the
management of selected sub-basins that are at a critical level of
eutrophication and contamination.
- Enforcing environmental laws and turning compulsory the wastewater
treatment.
- Initiating campaigns for environmental conservation and education in
order to include community participation in the process.
- Implement strict evaluation (qualitative and quantitative) mechanisms
for new developments such as large recreational aquatic parks, hotels,
docks, and channels.
- Stimulating the privatization of wastewater of treatment and the
water distribution in the municipalities.
A large source of contamination and eutrophication in São Paulo
State, and especially in the Tietê River, is the discharge of
untreated sewage in the São Paulo Capital. This is a very important
(e.g., more than 60%) source of nitrogen and phosphorus downstream
resulting in a large-scale eutrophication process now spreading to 300 km
from São Paulo in the western direction.
Integration of management, operation, monitoring, and modeling at the
level of São Paulo town is one of the initiatives that have been
taken in order to develop new procedures for control of eutrophication and
recovery, and optimization of management.
As for the six reservoirs downstream of the middle Tietê River
basin (Figure 7.15), the waterway authority now controls the whole system
and is the major leading organization for the water quality. All the
integration of institutional initiatives and the optimization of
management will depend on the articulation power and catalyzing capacity
of the waterway authority.
|