|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Planning and Management of Lakes and
Reservoirs: An Integrated Approach to Eutrophication>
CHAPTER 6. TECHNOLOGICAL AND MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF EUTROPHICATION
6.10. Monitoring as a Management and Decision-Making Tool in Water
Quality and Eutrophication
6.10.4. Data for Eutrophication Management and Control
There are several different ways of monitoring for the impacts of
eutrophication and to determine management options.
Chemical Monitoring
In the majority of lakes and reservoirs studied to date, the limiting
nutrient is phosphorus. Therefore, most monitoring and management
programmes for eutrophication control have focused on phosphorus
management. In most conventional monitoring programmes phosphorus is
measured in two forms: one is the total phosphorus (TP) and the other is a
measure of the soluble form of phosphorus that is readily bioavailable.
Unfortunately, the soluble form is sufficiently unstable that if the
analysis is not performed in the field at the time of sampling, any later
analysis in the laboratory is usually in error. As a consequence, many
national monitoring programmes are reconsidering the value of making
laboratory measurements of soluble phosphorus. Fortunately, experience has
shown that for most practical purposes, management strategies for
phosphorus control can be made using values of total phosphorus. Note that
for coastal and estuarine eutrophication it is nitrogen that is usually of
concern.
For river environments, phosphorus monitoring for management
purposes is to: (a) calculate the loading of phosphorus transport
downstream into the receiving water body; (b) determine the relative
importance of point versus non-point sources; and (c) determine if
remediation measures are producing the desired effects. Phosphorus is,
however, closely associated with fine particles such as silt and clay
where it is adsorbed by manganese and iron that commonly coat these fine
particles. In North America and Europe, the percentage of the annual load
of phosphorus that is associated with fine particles has been reported as
up to 90% or more. The higher values are associated with rivers that have
seasonally high concentrations of suspended solids due to erosion from
agricultural lands. In such cases, fixed-interval monitoring programmes
tend to greatly underestimate the annual loading of phosphorus -
potentially, by up to one order of magnitude. Monitoring for Total-P is
generally satisfactory for estimating the gross loading of phosphorus. In
some instances it may be useful to know the relative amounts of the
various species of sediment-associated phosphorus (see below), however,
this is best carried out within a limited survey programme.
Chemical monitoring is more difficult in a lake or reservoir
environment. The association of phosphorus with fine-grained sediments
(i.e., silts and clays) requires an estimate of the amount of phosphorus,
which is transported with the sediment load to the lake, and with the
sediment that has been deposited in the bottom of the lake. For sediment
deposited in the lake, especially in situations where the bottom of the
lake is periodically or seasonally anoxic, solubilization and release of
phosphorus from bottom sediments can become a major part of the phosphorus
loading to the water column. This is known as the "internal loading"
and has been often ignored in many engineering studies for the restoration
of lakes.
The phenomenon of phosphorus cycling, from bottom sediments to the water
column, uptake by phytoplankton, then deposition back to the bottom
sediments as the phytoplankton die, must be broken in order to manage
eutrophication. The data required are not included in normal monitoring
programmes and require some level of research activity. Fortunately, the
data are relatively easy to obtain and the models that predict phosphorus
cycling are available. Sediment-associated phosphorus values can be
obtained by chemical analysis for several types of phosphorus species.
Bio-Assessment
Eutrophication is associated with abundant growth of biomass. Different
levels of eutrophication tend to be associated with different types and
quantities of algal species. These are discussed elsewhere in this volume.
The most common biological parameter in a monitoring regime for
eutrophication is that of chlorophyll-a which is a measure of primary
production (algal biomass) in the water column. Measures of chlorophyll-a
are included in some trophic classification systems. Another measure of
primary production is the concentration of particulate organic carbon
(POC).
In the past, there has been considerable work on the use of algal assays
as a direct measure of phosphorus that is associated with sediments, i.e.,
suspended or bottom sediments. Such procedures may be useful in special
studies of eutrophic lakes/reservoirs, but should not be considered as
part of routine monitoring programmes.
Estimation Techniques
A particular problem in many countries is the lack of necessary and
reliable data to estimate the nature and scope of the eutrophication
problem. These data are further necessary to develop nutrient loading and
to make management decisions on the type of source controls that are
likely to make significant improvement in the level of eutrophication. A
variety of estimating techniques is available in the literature and may be
used in conjunction with water quality monitoring data.
- Point Source Estimation: Databases on effluent
characterization from different types of industries can be used to
estimate nutrient loading from municipal and industrial sources.
- Non-Point Sources Estimation: Typically, agricultural and
urban run-off sources are the principal non-point sources that
contribute significant quantities of nutrient to the aquatic
environment. Estimation techniques vary from data-intensive modeling
procedures that are used in agricultural land management practice, to
unit load (i.e., tonnes/km²) of phosphorus, nitrogen, metals, etc.,
that runs off the land during rainfall or irrigation events. For studies
of eutrophication the value of models must be judged against the cost of
data collection to run the models.
An alternative that has been useful in the United States has been the
calculation of "loading values" which are developed from
monitoring (usually) of single-crop areas in small river basins of from a
few to several hundred square kilometers in area. Similar data are
available in the literature for nutrient run-off from urban areas. Such
estimates are, however, crude and may vary over more than an order of
magnitude due to the natural variability caused by agronomic, climatic,
physical, and spatial factors. Loading values should not be extrapolated
beyond the range of conditions included in the case studies from which the
loadings are calculated. In studies of eutrophication, monitoring data on
phosphorus together with knowledge of river basin characteristics (land
use, demography, etc.) can be integrated to provide estimates of loading
from non-monitored basins elsewhere in the study region. Other estimation
techniques are related to specific activities such as duck-keeping or
pig-rearing. Pollutant loading has been calculated on the basis of "x"
number of fish (in aquaculture) or ducks etc., per unit of time. Such
values are useful, especially for activities occurring directly on, in, or
adjacent to, the water. Unfortunately, there appears to be no systematic
compilation of these loading factors in the literature.
|