|
Newsletter and Technical Publications
<Planning and Management of Lakes and
Reservoirs: An Integrated Approach to Eutrophication>
CHAPTER 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF EUTROPHICATION
1.5. Management Guidelines
Wise management policies for economic development with an aim to
moderate eutrophication should encompass the whole watershed of a lake or
reservoir. Two major elements that should be included in management of
eutrophication are information about the loading of nutrients and an
assessment of their impacts. Planning decisions should accept the
uncertainty inherent in the understanding of causal relations and in the
natural variability of aquatic ecosystems as they are influenced by
fluctuations in climate, hydrology and biological populations. Hence,
probabilistic forecasts are more appropriate than specific predictions.
Following four strategies, with different time frames and purposes, can
be applied to the management of eutrophication:
- Waste water treatment to meet a standard acceptable for a specific
use.
- Manipulation of conditions within the lake or reservoir to ameliorate
the symptoms of the problem.
- Control of an input at its source, such as the removal of phosphates
from detergents.
- Actions within the watershed and/or body of water that address the
causes of the problem.
Approaches to the first two strategies are dealt with in Chapter 6 of
this publication. Implementation of the third type of option involves
economic and cultural aspects considered in Chapters 5 and 2,
respectively, of this publication. General aspects of the fourth strategy
are discussed here.
In situations, which commonly exist in developing countries,
eutrophication may have positive impacts that may override negative
aspects. Greater yields from aquaculture or fish harvest from lakes or
reservoirs may well exceed perceptions that green waters are not
aesthetically pleasing to some. Furthermore, eutrophication control
measures that are linked to biomass harvesting of fish and plants may be
more economically and socially acceptable in some developing countries.
Shallow lakes present different challenges to eutrophication assessment
and control than deep lakes, especially in tropical settings. Reduction in
external nutrient loading is often not effective because internal loading
from nutrient-enriched sediments is sufficient to maintain eutrophic
conditions. Resuspension of surficial sediments can lead to high
concentrations of suspended matter, which hampers operation of water
purification facilities and can further enrich the water with nitrogen and
phosphorus. Pantropical introductions of water hyacinth (Eichhornia
crassipes ) and the aquatic fern (Salvinia molesta ) have led
to prolific infestations of these floating aquatic plants that thrive in
shallow, nutrient-rich waters. While harvesting of these plants can reduce
nutrients and provide organic matter for other purposes, removal is often
not possible on a sufficient scale to maintain open water as a habitat or
for navigation. Problems with the introduction of water hyacinth are
discussed in Chapter 7 of this publication.
Point sources of nitrogen or phosphorus loading can be effectively
controlled, if sufficient financial resources are available.
Well-developed technologies exist on several scales to remove nitrogen and
phosphorus from effluents of sewage and industrial plants. Reclamation and
recycling of phosphorus contained in these wastes is possible, if heavy
metal contamination is not a problem. In contrast, reducing inputs to
lakes and reservoirs from non-point sources usually requires modifications
to land uses. In particular, establishment of riparian vegetation can
reduce nitrogen and phosphorus transfers from land to water. If the
watershed is forested, policies should encourage retaining half the forest
and should ensure that forest is left along stream and river corridors.
Grazing pressure and extent of mechanized agriculture should be regulated.
In hypereutrophic lake application of conventional remedial measures to
reduce its nutrient input are unrealistic. There is sufficient nutrients
recycling in the system. In some extreme cases, bacteria dominate
production. Corrective measures, such as algicides, sediment sealing or
aeration have to be employed. The selection of the corrective measure
depends on the expected use of the lake, and for hypereutrophic lakes the
uses will most likely be fish production, irrigation and perhaps
recreation that does not entail contact with the water.
|