|
Freshwater Management
Series No. 7
Phytotechnologies
A Technical
Approach in Environmental Management
III. Examples
of Environmental Applications of Phytotechnology >
B. Natural Wetlands
Natural wetlands are important for maintaining aquatic ecosystem biodiversity and should be considered as part of an effective ecosystem management strategy.
There are four major groups of natural wetlands:
 |
• |
Fringe wetlands, which include salt marshes and lakeside
marshes in which water typically flows in two opposite directions, influenced
by lunar and/or storm tides, |
 |
• |
Riverine wetlands, which occupy floodplains, are usually
characterised by water flowing in one direction, |
 |
• |
Depressional wetlands, such as prairie potholes, which usually receive
much of their water from runoff and/or groundwater seepage rather than
from surface water bodies, so that water residence times are longer, |
 |
• |
Peatlands also have long water residence times, but the accumulated
peat creates a unique hydrologic regime that differs from the previous
three types of wetlands. |
Geomorphic setting, water source, and hydr odynamics generate considerable variation
within each of these different categories of wetlands.
Water quality improvement is a positive service attributed to wetlands that
absorb and recycle nutrients from human settlements. The denitrification potential
of wetlands is often surprisingly high. As much as 2,000 to 3,000 kg of nitrate-nitrogen
can be denitrified per hectare of wetlands per year, depending on the hydraulic
conditions. This is important for the protection of surface waters because
a significant amount of nitrate is released by agricultural activities. As
much as 100 kg nitrate-nitrogen per hectare may be found in the drainage water
from intensive agriculture. Since the denitrification is accompanied by the
oxidation of organic matter, this process also removes a significant amount
of organic matter.
Table 6 provides an overview of the different types and characteristics of
wetlands are found adjacent to surface water bodies (i.e., wet meadows, freshwater
marshes, forested wetlands, saltwater marshes, bogs, and shoreline wetlands).
Their different abilities to cope with various non-point pollution problems
are also summarized.
Table
6: Characteristics of Wetlands Adjacent to Lakes and Their
Ability to Retain Non-Point Source Pollutants (UNEP/IETC, 1999)
| Type of Wetland |
Characteristics |
Ability to Retain Non-Point SourcePollutants |
| Wet meadows |
Grassland with waterlogged soil; standing water for part of the year |
Denitrification only in standing water; removal of nitrogen and phosphorus
by harvest. |
| Fresh water marshes |
Reed-grass dominated, often with peat accumulation |
High potential for denitrification, which is limited by the hydraulic
conductivity |
| Forested wetlands |
Dominated by trees, shrubs; standing water, but not always for the entire
year |
High potential for denitrification and accumulation of pollutants, provided
that standing water is present |
| Salt water marshes |
Herbaceous vegetation, usually with mineral soil |
Medium potential for denitrification; harvest possible |
| Bogs |
A peat-accumulating wetland with minor flows |
High potential for denitrification but limited by small hydraulic conductivity |
| Shoreline wetlands |
Littoral vegetation of significant importance for lakes and reservoirs |
High potential for denitrification and accumulation of pollutants, but
limited coverage |
|